AccScience Publishing / HPR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/HPR026320194
Cite this article
9
Download
332
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
COMMENTARY

Digital environments and human agency in the age of AI: How algorithmic logic compresses or restores authentic being

Sydney X. Hu1*
Show Less
1 Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau , Macau SAR
Received: 4 August 2026 | Revised: 22 August 2026 | Accepted: 26 August 2026 | Published online: 2 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Contemporary AI-mediated platforms systematically narrow the conditions under which authentic agency can be expressed—a process Commentary terms stage compression, operating at two levels: synchronically, constraining the range of identities available in any given interaction; diachronically, foreclosing the developmental windows within which genuine identity exploration can unfold. Existing health psychology frameworks address downstream symptoms without theorising these structural conditions. This Commentary identifies this gap and sketches Dual Agency Theory for Authentic Being (DAT) as one possible direction: drawing on structuration theory, relational autonomy frameworks, and self-determination theory, DAT proposes that self-directed and other-directed agency are mutually constitutive. Platform success, on this account, should be measured not by engagement metrics but by whether users develop stronger capacities for self-regulation and genuine social connectedness.

Keywords
Stage compression
Structural gap
Authentic agency
Dual agency
Health psychology
AI design
Professional autonomy
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Alkhalifah JM, Bedaiwi AM, Shaikh N, Seddiq W, Meo SA. Existential anxiety about artificial intelligence (AI)- is it the end of humanity era or a new chapter in the human revolution: questionnaire-based observational study. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1368122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1368122
  2. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227-268. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
  3. Bucher T. If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  4. Katebi M, Bahreini M, Bagherzadeh R, Pouladi S. Artificial Intelligence and Nursing Management: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations—A Scoping Review. J Nurs Manag. 2025;2025(1):2797535. doi: 10.1155/jonm/2797535
  5. Marwick AE, Boyd D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc. 2011;13(1):114-133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
  6. Wood AM, Linley PA, Maltby J, Baliousis M, Joseph S. The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. J Couns Psychol. 2008;55(3):385-399. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385
  7. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984.
  8. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  9. Schwartz L, Levy J, Endevelt-Shapira Y, et al. Technologically-assisted communication attenuates inter-brain synchrony. NeuroImage. 2022;264:119677. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119677
  10. Soltanzadeh S. A metaphysical account of agency for technology governance. AI Soc. 2025;40(3):1723-1734. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-01941-z
  11. Wang Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Yeung D, Wu Y. Effect of a cognitive behavioral therapy-based AI chatbot on depression and loneliness in Chinese university students: randomized controlled trial with financial stress moderation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025;13:e63806. doi: 10.2196/63806
  12. Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98(2):224-253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by AccScience Publishing