AccScience Publishing / HPR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/HPR026210104
Cite this article
16
Download
303
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Narrative nursing for tuberculous empyema surgery: A single-center quasi-experimental study of perioperative anxiety and depression

Yishuang Liu1† Qibin Liu1,2† Jianjie Wang1 Fang Xu1 Tao Zuo1 Jie Wang1 Shuang Wei1,3,4*
Show Less
1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control), Hubei Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei , China
2 National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei , China
3 Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of Health Ministry, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei , China
4 Research Institute of Pulmonary Infectious Diseases, Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei , China
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 18 May 2026 | Revised: 7 August 2026 | Accepted: 11 August 2026 | Published online: 26 August 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Tuberculous empyema surgery combines chronic infectious disease stigma with operative stress, yet conventional perioperative nursing rarely addresses illness identity and self-stigma. Narrative nursing may help reconstruct illness narratives, but evidence remains limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether structured narrative nursing from admission through three months post–chest tube removal reduces anxiety and depression compared with routine care.

Methods: In this single-center, non-randomized quasi-experimental study (December 2022–December 2023), patients admitted during odd weeks received narrative nursing plus routine care; even-week admissions received routine care alone. The intervention comprised eight structured sessions (30–50 min) integrating narrative therapy with perioperative milestones. Primary outcomes were GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores at baseline and three months after chest tube removal. Analysis of covariance was adjusted for baseline scores, and an E-value sensitivity analysis assessed unmeasured confounders.

Results: Of 96 eligible patients, 92 completed follow-up (46 per group). At three months, the narrative nursing group showed significantly lower mean GAD-7 (4.83 ± 2.11 vs. 7.26 ± 2.58; p < 0.001; d = 1.04) and PHQ-9 (5.37 ± 2.46 vs. 8.04 ± 2.93; p < 0.001; d = 0.99) scores. Moderate-to-severe anxiety (10.87% vs. 30.43%, p = 0.018) and depression (13.04% vs. 34.78%, p = 0.015) were also lower. E-values were 2.8 for GAD-7 and 2.7 for PHQ-9.

Conclusion: Structured narrative nursing is associated with substantially lower anxiety and depression three months post–chest tube removal. Despite large effect sizes, the non-randomized, single-center design limits causal inference. Randomized controlled trials with active controls and longer follow-up are warranted.

Keywords
Narrative nursing
Tuberculous empyema
Thoracic surgery
Anxiety
Depression
Quasi-experimental study
Psychosocial intervention
Stigma
Funding
This work was supported by the Preventive Medicine Association of Hubei Province (No. 2025SWGKY391) and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital under the “Open Competition for the Best Candidates” program (No. WF2025Y06; No. WF2025Y08). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
  1. Chen B, Zhang J, Ye Z, et al. Outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgical decortication in 274 patients with tuberculous empyema. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21(3):223-228. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.14-00185
  2. Liu J, Luan Y, Han Q, Zhao W. Measures to accelerate recovery from stage III tuberculous empyema: tuberculous empyema surgical and recovery methods. Perioper Med. 2025;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00530-y
  3. Hayward SE, Deal A, Rustage K, et al. The relationship between mental health and risk of active tuberculosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e048945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048945
  4. Oh KH, Choi H, Kim EJ, et al. Depression and risk of tuberculosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(7):804-809. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0038
  5. Sutar R, Majumdar A, Yadav V, Basera DS, Gupta H. Anxiety, stress, and quality of life in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ind Psychiatry J. 2024;33(1):13-29. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_58_23
  6. Lee G, Scuffell J, Galea JT, et al. Impact of mental disorders on active TB treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020;24(12):1279-1284. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0458
  7. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Touchstone; 1963.
  8. Chen X, Chen Y, Zhou L, Tong J. The role of self-esteem as moderator of the relationship between experienced stigma and anxiety and depression among tuberculosis patients. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34129-4
  9. Nuttall C, Fuady A, Nuttall H, et al. Interventions pathways to reduce tuberculosis-related stigma: a literature review and conceptual framework. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022;11(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01021-8
  10. Foster I, Biewer A, Vanqa N, et al. “This is an illness. No one is supposed to be treated badly”: community-based stigma assessments in South Africa to inform tuberculosis stigma intervention design. BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00070-5
  11. Charon R. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1897-1902. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.15.1897
  12. White M, Epston D. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. W W Norton & Company; 1990.
  13. Hansson L, Lexén A, Holmén J. The effectiveness of narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy: a randomized controlled study of a self-stigma intervention. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52(11):1415-1423. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1385-x
  14. Ghielen I, Rutten S, Boeschoten RE, et al. The effects of cognitive behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies on psychological distress in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease: two meta-analyses. J Psychosom Res. 2019;122:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.05.001
  15. Sweetland AC, Kritski A, Oquendo MA, et al. Addressing the tuberculosis-depression syndemic to end the tuberculosis epidemic. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(8):852-861. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0584
  16. Feng J, Ge L, Jin F, Jiang L. Application of narrative nursing combined with focused solution model to anxiety and depression in patients with lung tumor during perioperative period. Front Surg. 2022;9:858506. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858506
  17. Wu LH, Li J, Jia SF, Guo YJ. The effect of narrative nursing on improving the negative emotions and quality of life of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Clin Transl Oncol. 2025;27(1):182-188. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03549-7
  18. Sun L, Liu X, Weng X, et al. Narrative therapy to relieve stigma in oral cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2022;28(4):e12926. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12926
  19. Raghuraman S, Stuttard N, Hunt N. Evaluating narrative exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms: a meta-analysis of the evidence base. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021;28(1):1-23. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2486
  20. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N; TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of non-randomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):361-366. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.361
  21. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  22. Toussaint A, Hüsing P, Gumz A, et al. Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). J Affect Disord. 2020;265:395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.032
  23. Aktürk Z, Hapfelmeier A, Fomenko A, et al. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and 2-item (GAD-2) scales for detecting anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025;3(3):CD015455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015455
  24. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
  25. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  26. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123-1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
  27. VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607
  28. Pennebaker JW. Expressive writing in psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(2):226-229. doi: 10.1177/1745691617707315
  29. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393
  30. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377-399. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067
  31. Fioretti C, Mazzocco K, Riva S, et al. Research studies on patients’ illness experience using the narrative medicine approach: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e011220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011220

 

Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by AccScience Publishing