AccScience Publishing / HPR / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/HPR026200101
Cite this article
14
Download
225
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
SHORT COMMUNICATION

Psychological adjustment and well-being in hidden student mobility: A study of Moldovan students in Romania

Mihaela-Alexandra Gherman1† Laura Arhiri1†* Camelia Soponaru1 Ancuța Elena Păduraru1 Jana Chihai2 Victor Șchiopu3
Show Less
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Iași , Romania
2 Department of Mental Health, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine No. 1, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chișinău , Moldova
3 Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine No. 1, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chișinău , Moldova
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 17 May 2026 | Revised: 18 August 2026 | Accepted: 18 August 2026 | Published online: 4 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Student mobility carries mental health and well-being risks, particularly when transition-related needs are hidden by formal student categories.

Objective: This short communication examines Moldovan students with Romanian citizenship in Romanian higher education. Legally classified as domestic, they may undergo an international-like adjustment involving linguistic, cultural, academic, and relational transition.

Methods: We analyzed semi-structured interviews with 24 such students using reflexive thematic analysis and interpreted them through an integrated lens of belonging uncertainty, minority stress, and transactional stress-coping models within a biopsychosocial framework. Four themes were generated: social stressors and belonging difficulties, including accent-based othering and withdrawal; academic and institutional stressors, including educational culture mismatch and help-seeking barriers; mental and physical health costs, including fear of failure, emotional exhaustion, and somatic symptoms; and mixed coping and support strategies.

Results: What distinguishes these accounts from generic student adjustment appears to be their configuration: difference attributed to nationality rather than to socioeconomic or regional background, legal contingency, cross-system educational discontinuity, and the absence of any administrative category through which support might be triggered. Because such students are invisible to provision keyed to international status, screening and belonging-based support should be indexed to adjustment need rather than enrollment category, and directed at institutional conduct as well as individual coping.

Conclusion: Hidden student mobility may constitute a distinct adjustment context in which substantial cross-border transition is obscured by domestic administrative status. Recognizing adjustment needs independently of formal enrolment categories may help institutions identify otherwise overlooked students and design more equitable, context-sensitive support.

Graphical abstract
Keywords
Psychological adjustment
Student well-being
Mental health
Academic stress
Coping
Hidden mobility
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-IV-P8-8.3-ROMD-2023-0316, within PNCDI IV.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Maharaj R, Ndwiga D, Chutiyami M. Mental health and wellbeing of international students in Australia: A systematic review. J Ment Health. 2025;34(4):431-449. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2390393
  2. van Kessel G, Ryan C, Paras L, Johnson NA, Zariff RZ, Stallman HM. Relationship between university belonging and student outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Educ Res. 2025;52(3):2511-2534. doi: 10.1007/s13384-025-00822-8
  3. Walton GM, Murphy MC, Logel C, et al. Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college? Science. 2023;380(6644):499-505. doi: 10.1126/science.ade4420
  4. Walton GM, Cohen GL. A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(1):82-96. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
  5. Le Forestier JM, Chan EW, Shephard R, Page-Gould E, Chasteen AL. Why is concealment associated with health and wellbeing? An investigation of potential mechanisms. Soc Sci Med. 2024;344:116529. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116529
  6. Frost DM, Meyer IH. Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance. Curr Opin Psychol. 2023;51:101579. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101579
  7. Yan X. The impact of accent stigma on self-efficacy and acculturation strategy among international students in the United States. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1414282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414282
  8. Zhao R, Amanvermez Y, Pei J, et al. Research review: Help-seeking intentions, behaviors, and barriers in college students – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025;66(10):1593-1605. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14145
  9. Schaeffer M, Kas J. The integration paradox: A review and meta-analysis of the complex relationship between integration and reports of discrimination. Int Migr Rev. 2024;58(3):1384-1409. doi: 10.1177/01979183231170809
  10. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 1984.
  11. Bolton D. A revitalized biopsychosocial model: Core theory, research paradigms, and clinical implications. Psychol Med. 2023;53(16):7504-7511. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002660
  12. Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol. 2022;9(1):3-26. doi: 10.1037/qup0000196
  13. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  14. Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2021;13(2):201-216. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
  15. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
  16. Kreniske P, Mellins CA, Shea E, et al. Associations between low-household income and first-generation status with college student belonging, mental health, and well-being. Emerg Adulthood. 2023;11(3):710-720. doi: 10.1177/21676968221124649
  17. Côté-Olijnyk M, Perry JC, Paré ME, Kronick R. The mental health of migrants living in limbo: A mixed-methods systematic review with meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2024;337:115931. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115931
  18. Țițan E, Oțoiu A, Paraschiv D, Manea D. Can earmarked admission places help address the perceived rural disadvantage in higher education access? Evidence from Romania. Oxf Rev Educ. 2024;50(2):167-185. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2022.2136151
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by AccScience Publishing