Health Psychology Research / HPR / Online First / DOI: 10.14440/hpr.0108
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Development and Validation of the English Version of the School Burnout Inventory for University Students

Silvia Platania1 Kenneth B. Abrams2 Santo Di Nuovo1 Maria C. Quattropani1 Fiammetta Cosci3 Claudio Maggio1 Alice Caruso1 Abdulnaser Fakhrou4 Jennifer DiPiazza5 Mahmoud Ali Moussa6 Pasquale Caponnetto1,7,8*
Show Less
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Sicily 95121, Italy
2 Department of Psychology, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota 55057, United States of America
3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Tuscany 50134, Italy
4 Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Education University, Doha 2713, Qatar
5 Fairfield University Egan School of Nursing 1073 North Benson Road, Connecticut 06824, United States of America
6 Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41528, Egypt
7 Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction, University of Catania, Catania, Sicily 95123, Italy
8 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Sicily 95123, Italy
Submitted: 24 April 2025 | Revised: 30 July 2025 | Accepted: 31 July 2025 | Published: 6 October 2025
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background

Academic burnout arises in response to prolonged stress related to university study demands. It is characterized by three main dimensions: Emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced personal effectiveness. Chronic academic stress can lead to mental health issues, such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Early detection of burnout allows for intervention before more severe symptoms develop.

Objective

This study aimed to develop and assess the psychometric properties of the English version of the School Burnout Inventory (SBI) for University Students while providing further psychometric evidence for the pre-existing Italian version of the scale (SBI-U/I).

Methods

The study included 194 university students from the United States. The scale’s factorial structure was examined, and the results were compared with the previously published Italian version. Cross-cultural validity was tested through an invariance analysis across gender and both scale versions. Convergent validity was assessed through bivariate correlation analysis.

Results

The findings confirmed that the three-factor structure was consistent with prior data. Confirmatory factor analysis of the American sample showed good model fit (χ2 [24] = 51.991, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.98, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.078). Reliability coefficients were acceptable (α = 0.77–0.88). Measurement invariance was supported across gender and country (ΔCFI ≤ 0.011, easurem≤ 0.002), confirming cross-cultural validity. Convergent validity was evidenced by significant correlations with perceived stress (r = 0.19–0.32, p<0.01). The scale’s validity was further supported by invariance analyses across gender and cultural contexts.

Conclusion

The study confirmed that both versions of the SBI-U scales are valid for assessing academic burnout and can be used for cross-cultural comparisons. This underscores the importance of early burnout detection in university students, facilitating targeted interventions to enhance their well-being.

Keywords
Academic burnout
Validation
Clinical psychometric properties
Cross-cultural validity
Stress
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
As the Editor-in-Chief of this journal, Pasquale Caponnetto was not involved in the editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper. Separately, other authors declared that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
References
[1]
  1. Koropets O, Fedorova A, Kacane I. Emotional and academic burnout of students com­bining education and work. In: Conference: EDULEARN19 - 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies IATED; 2019. p. 8227-8232.

 

  1. Sarkar D. Researcher well-being and burn­out: Understanding the causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Int J Res Educ Sci Methods. 2023;11(7):1824-1831.

 

  1. Morando M, Smeriglio R, Maggio C, Di Nuovo S, Platania S. Incidence and occurrence of academic burnout: The impact of personality, self-efficacy and self-esteem and post-pandemic effects. Environ Soc Psychol. 2023;8(2):1684. doi: 10.54517/esp. v8i2.1684

 

  1. Thuruthel JO, Tungol JR. Causes and Impacts of Burnout on Students’ Well-Being: A Review; 2021. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/ gcd:154704046?sid=ebsco: plink:crawler&id=eb­sco: gcd:154704046 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 24].

 

  1. Madigan DJ, Curran T. Does burnout affect academic achievement? A meta-analysis of over 100,000 students. Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;33:387- 405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09533-1

 

  1. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

 

  1. Buscemi A, Rapisarda A, Platania S, Maida F, Brancati D, Petralia MC. The woman in preg­nancy: Body care by knowing of alternative medicine. Acta Med Mediterr. 2016;32:953-958. doi: 10.19193/0393-6384_2016_4_115

 

  1. Soliemanifar O, Shaabani F. The relationship between personality traits and academic burn­out in postgraduate students. J Educ Manage Stud. 2013;3:60-63.

 

  1. Platania S, Gruttadauria S, Citelli G, Giambrone L, Di Nuovo S. Associations of thalas­semia major and satisfaction with quality of life: The mediating effect of social support. Health Psychol Open. 2017;4(2):2055102917742054. doi: 10.1177/2055102917742054

 

  1. Platania S, Morando M, Santisi G. The phenom­enon of brand hate: Analysis of predictors and out­comes. Qual Access Success. 2017;18:342-347.

 

  1. Bateman TS, Crant JM. The proactive compo­nent of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J Organ Behav. 1993;14(2):103-118.

 

  1. Santisi G, Platania S, Hichy Z. A lifestyle analy­sis of young consumers: A study in Italian context. Young Consum. 2014;15(1):94-104. doi: 10.1108/ YC-03-2013-00357

 

  1. Caballero Domínguez CC, Hederich C, Palacio Sañudo JE. Academic burnout: Delineation of the syndrome and factors associ­ated with their emergence. Rev Latinoam Psicol. 2010;42(1):131-146.

 

  1. Salmela-Aro K, Kiuru N, Leskinen E, Nurmi JE. School burnout inventory (SBI) reliability and validity. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2009;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.48

 

  1. Salmela-Aro K, Kunttu K. Study burnout and engagement in higher education. Unterrichtswiss. 2010;38(4):318-333.

 

  1. Boada-Grau J, Merino-Tejedor E, Sánchez- García JC. Adaptation and psychometric proper­ties of the SBI-U scale for academic burnout in university students. An Psicol. 2015;31(1):290-297. doi: 10.6018/analesps.31.1.168581

 

  1. Platania S, Di Nuovo S, Caruso A, Digrandi F, Caponnetto P. Stress among university students: The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SBI-U 9 scale for academic burnout in univer­sity students. Health Psychol Res. 2020;8(2):8209. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2020.9209

 

  1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-396.

 

  1. Lorenzo-Seva U, Timmerman ME, Kiers HA. The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(2):340-364. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.564527

 

  1. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009.

 

  1. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013. p. 516.

 

  1. Chalmers RP. mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1-29.doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06

 

  1. Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. ETS Res Bull Ser. 1968;1968(1):I-169.

 

  1. Davidov E, Meuleman B, Cieciuch J, Schmidt P, Billiet J. Measurement equivalence in cross-na­tional research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2014;40(1):55-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137

 

  1. Aubert B, Bona M, Boutigny D, et al. Evidence for B0 → ρ0ρ0 decays and implications for the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa angle α. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(11):111801. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.98.111801

 

  1. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invari­ance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464-504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834

 

  1. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

 

  1. Kline P. Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge; 2013.

 

  1. Škerlavaj M, Dimovski V. Organizational learn­ing and performance in two national cultures: A mul­ti-group structural equation modeling approach. In: King WR, editor. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. New York, NY: Springer US; 2009. p. 321-367. Available from: https://link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011

 

  1. Milfont TL, Fischer R. Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cul­tural research. Int J Psychol Res. 2010;3(1):111-130. doi: 10.21500/20112084.857
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research