Development and Validation of the English Version of the School Burnout Inventory for University Students

Background
Academic burnout arises in response to prolonged stress related to university study demands. It is characterized by three main dimensions: Emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced personal effectiveness. Chronic academic stress can lead to mental health issues, such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Early detection of burnout allows for intervention before more severe symptoms develop.
Objective
This study aimed to develop and assess the psychometric properties of the English version of the School Burnout Inventory (SBI) for University Students while providing further psychometric evidence for the pre-existing Italian version of the scale (SBI-U/I).
Methods
The study included 194 university students from the United States. The scale’s factorial structure was examined, and the results were compared with the previously published Italian version. Cross-cultural validity was tested through an invariance analysis across gender and both scale versions. Convergent validity was assessed through bivariate correlation analysis.
Results
The findings confirmed that the three-factor structure was consistent with prior data. Confirmatory factor analysis of the American sample showed good model fit (χ2 [24] = 51.991, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.98, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.078). Reliability coefficients were acceptable (α = 0.77–0.88). Measurement invariance was supported across gender and country (ΔCFI ≤ 0.011, easurem≤ 0.002), confirming cross-cultural validity. Convergent validity was evidenced by significant correlations with perceived stress (r = 0.19–0.32, p<0.01). The scale’s validity was further supported by invariance analyses across gender and cultural contexts.
Conclusion
The study confirmed that both versions of the SBI-U scales are valid for assessing academic burnout and can be used for cross-cultural comparisons. This underscores the importance of early burnout detection in university students, facilitating targeted interventions to enhance their well-being.
- Koropets O, Fedorova A, Kacane I. Emotional and academic burnout of students combining education and work. In: Conference: EDULEARN19 - 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies IATED; 2019. p. 8227-8232.
- Sarkar D. Researcher well-being and burnout: Understanding the causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Int J Res Educ Sci Methods. 2023;11(7):1824-1831.
- Morando M, Smeriglio R, Maggio C, Di Nuovo S, Platania S. Incidence and occurrence of academic burnout: The impact of personality, self-efficacy and self-esteem and post-pandemic effects. Environ Soc Psychol. 2023;8(2):1684. doi: 10.54517/esp. v8i2.1684
- Thuruthel JO, Tungol JR. Causes and Impacts of Burnout on Students’ Well-Being: A Review; 2021. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/ gcd:154704046?sid=ebsco: plink:crawler&id=ebsco: gcd:154704046 [Last accessed on 2024 Jan 24].
- Madigan DJ, Curran T. Does burnout affect academic achievement? A meta-analysis of over 100,000 students. Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;33:387- 405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09533-1
- Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
- Buscemi A, Rapisarda A, Platania S, Maida F, Brancati D, Petralia MC. The woman in pregnancy: Body care by knowing of alternative medicine. Acta Med Mediterr. 2016;32:953-958. doi: 10.19193/0393-6384_2016_4_115
- Soliemanifar O, Shaabani F. The relationship between personality traits and academic burnout in postgraduate students. J Educ Manage Stud. 2013;3:60-63.
- Platania S, Gruttadauria S, Citelli G, Giambrone L, Di Nuovo S. Associations of thalassemia major and satisfaction with quality of life: The mediating effect of social support. Health Psychol Open. 2017;4(2):2055102917742054. doi: 10.1177/2055102917742054
- Platania S, Morando M, Santisi G. The phenomenon of brand hate: Analysis of predictors and outcomes. Qual Access Success. 2017;18:342-347.
- Bateman TS, Crant JM. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J Organ Behav. 1993;14(2):103-118.
- Santisi G, Platania S, Hichy Z. A lifestyle analysis of young consumers: A study in Italian context. Young Consum. 2014;15(1):94-104. doi: 10.1108/ YC-03-2013-00357
- Caballero Domínguez CC, Hederich C, Palacio Sañudo JE. Academic burnout: Delineation of the syndrome and factors associated with their emergence. Rev Latinoam Psicol. 2010;42(1):131-146.
- Salmela-Aro K, Kiuru N, Leskinen E, Nurmi JE. School burnout inventory (SBI) reliability and validity. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2009;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.48
- Salmela-Aro K, Kunttu K. Study burnout and engagement in higher education. Unterrichtswiss. 2010;38(4):318-333.
- Boada-Grau J, Merino-Tejedor E, Sánchez- García JC. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the SBI-U scale for academic burnout in university students. An Psicol. 2015;31(1):290-297. doi: 10.6018/analesps.31.1.168581
- Platania S, Di Nuovo S, Caruso A, Digrandi F, Caponnetto P. Stress among university students: The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SBI-U 9 scale for academic burnout in university students. Health Psychol Res. 2020;8(2):8209. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2020.9209
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-396.
- Lorenzo-Seva U, Timmerman ME, Kiers HA. The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(2):340-364. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.564527
- Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009.
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013. p. 516.
- Chalmers RP. mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1-29.doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
- Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. ETS Res Bull Ser. 1968;1968(1):I-169.
- Davidov E, Meuleman B, Cieciuch J, Schmidt P, Billiet J. Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2014;40(1):55-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
- Aubert B, Bona M, Boutigny D, et al. Evidence for B0 → ρ0ρ0 decays and implications for the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa angle α. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98(11):111801. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.98.111801
- Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464-504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
- Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
- Kline P. Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge; 2013.
- Škerlavaj M, Dimovski V. Organizational learning and performance in two national cultures: A multi-group structural equation modeling approach. In: King WR, editor. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. New York, NY: Springer US; 2009. p. 321-367. Available from: https://link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011
- Milfont TL, Fischer R. Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. Int J Psychol Res. 2010;3(1):111-130. doi: 10.21500/20112084.857