Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 3 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.4081/​hpr.2015.2209
GENERAL

A study to examine the uses  of personal strength in relation  to mental health recovery in  adults with serious mental  illnesses: a research protocol

Huiting Xie1* Peng Yuan1 Song Song Cui1 Melissa Sng Siok Yen1
Show Less
1 Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
Submitted: 31 December 2013 | Revised: 17 February 2014 | Accepted: 17 February 2014 | Published: 30 September 2015
© 2015 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This study will explore the relationships among strengths self-efficacy, resourcefulness, stigma experience and mental health recovery in community-dwelling adults with serious men tal illnesses. Mental health practices have focued on psychopathphysiology. Stigma heavily plagued clients with mental illnesses and is one of the greatest barriers to mental health recov ery. Personal strengths like strengths self-effica cy, people’s confidence in using their personal strengths, and resourcefulness, the ability to carry out daily activities, have been linked to positive mental health. However, the linkage between strengths self-efficacy, resourcefulness and mental health recovery remains uncharted. A cross-sectional, descriptive, mixed methods study will be conducted. A funded study by the Sigma Theta Tau, Upsilon Eta Chapter, August 2013, involving a convenience sample of 100 par ticipants is planned.Included are community dwelling adults between 21 to 65 years old hav ing been diagnosed with serious mental illness es. Clients with current co-occurring substance abuse will be excluded. Participants complete questionnaires and undergo an interview. Correlations among the study variables will be examined. Regression analysis will determine if recovery can be predicted by strengths self-effi cacy, resourcefulness and stigma experience. Interview data will be transcribed and analyzed by thematic analysis. This study will look beyond clients’ disability to focus on their recovery and healing capacities such as strengths self-effica cy and resourcefulness. Findings will expand our knowledge about mental health recovery. Knowledge gained from this study may pave the way for future nursing strategies to aid recovery and inform the development of positive, strengths-based interventions. 

Keywords
Community psychiatric nursing; self efficacy; service user perspective; adult psychi atric nursing; patient perspectives
References

1. The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization world mental health survey. JAMA 2004;291:2581-90. 
2. World Health Organization. World Mental Health Day 2006: Building Awareness - Reducing Risks: Suicide and Mental Illness. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2006/pr53/en/index.html
3. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds. Global burden of disease. A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Geneva: WHO; 1996.
4. Chong SA. Mental health in Singapore: a quiet revolution? Ann Acad Med 2007;36:795-6.
5. Saleebey D. The strengths perspective in social work practice. 4th ed. Boston: MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
6. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosom Rehabil J 1993;16:11-23.
7. Farkas M. The vision of recovery today: what it is and what it means for services. World Psychiatry 2007;6:68-74.
8. Cloninger CR. The science of well-being: an integrated approach to mental health and its disorders. World Psychiatry 2006;5:71-6.
9. Yang LH. Application of mental illness stigma theory to Chinese societies: synthesis and new directions. Singapore Med J 2007;48:977-85.
10. Link BG, Struening EL, Neese-Todd S, et al. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: the consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 2001;52:1621-6.
11. Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS. Mental Health: a report of the surgeon general-executive summary. 1999. Available from: http://mentalhealth.about.com/library/sg/blsummary.htm
12. Oades LG, Deane FP, Crowe TP, et al. Collaborative recovery: an integrative model for working with individuals who experience chronic and recurring mental illness. Australasian Pshychiatry 2005;13:279-84.  
13. Peterson C, Park N, Seligman MEP. Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. J Posit Psychol 2006;1:17-26.
14. Epstein MH, Ruldolph S, Epstein AA. Strength based assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children 2000;32:50-4. 
15. Hodges TD, Clifton DO. Strengths-based development in practice. In: Linley PA, Joseph S, Eds. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2004. pp 256-268.
16. Bullock WA, Sage J, Hupp D, et al. Mental health, from illness to wellness: an evaluation of Ohio’s wellness management and recovery program in community mental health and consumer-operated service agencies. New Res Ment Health 2009;18:312-21.
17. Bekhet AK, Zauszniewski JA, Wykle ML. Milieu change and relocation adjustment in elders. West J Nurs Res 2008;30:113-29. 
18. Musil C, Warner C, Zauszniewski J, et al. Grandmother caregiving, family stress and strain and depressive symptoms. West J Nurs Res 2009;31:389-408. 
19. Zauszniewski JA, Bekhet A, Suresky M. Relationships among perceived burden, depressive cognitions, resourcefulness, and quality of life in female relatives of seriously mentally ill adults. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2009;30:142-50.
20. Alasia A, Bollman R, Parkins J, Reimer B. An index of community vulnerability: Conceptual framework and application to population and employment changes. Research Report N. 088. 2001. Available from: http://dsppsd.pwgsc.gc.ca/collec-tion_2008/statcan/21-601-M/21-601-MIE2008088.pdf 
21. Schneider Z, Elliott D, Lo-Biondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing research: methods, critical appraisal and utilization. New South Wales, Australia: Elsevier; 2003.
22. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educat Res 2004;33:14-26. 
23. Zauszniewski JA, Picot SJ, Roberts BL, et al. Predictors of resourcefulness in African American women. J Aging Health 2005;17:609-33.
24. Killaspy H, Rambarran D, Bledin K. Mental health needs of clients of rehabilitation services: a survey in one trust. J Mental Health 2008;17:207-18.
25. Dervaux A, Laqueille X, Bourdel MC, et al. Cannabis and schizophrenia: demographic and clinical correlates. Encephale 2003;29:11-7.
26. Drake RE, Wallach ME, McGovern MP. Special section on relapse prevention: future directions in preventing relapse to substance abuse among clients with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 2005;56:1297-302. 
27. Chaichanasakul A, Tsai CL, Zhao R, et al. Development and initial validation of the strengths self-efficacy scale. Doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri and Clifton Strengths School & Gallup, Columbia, MO. 2009.
28. Zauszniewski JA, Lai CY, Tithiphontumrong S. Development and testing of the resourcefulness scale for older adults. J Nurs Measur 2006;14:57-68.
29. Young SL, Ensing DS. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Rehabil J 1999;22:219-31. 
30. Bullock W.A. Mental health recovery measure. In: Campbell-Orde T, Chamberlin J, Carpenter J, Leff HS., Eds. Measuring the promise of recovery: a compendium of recovery measures. Cambridge, MA: The Evaluation Center; 2005.
31. King M, Dinos S, Shaw J, et al. The stigma scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2007;190:248-54.
32. Dinos S, Stevens S, Serfaty M, et al. Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:176-81. 
33. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
34. Speziale HJS, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
35. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare nopotential conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research