Heritability of health and aging limitations on personally desired activities
The aim of this study is to estimate heri tability of incident limitations on personally desired activities within the eighth decade of life. We measured self-rated ability to perform ten personally desired activities in 1606 male veteran twin pairs at baseline and four years later. At follow-up, 33% of the cohort reported more limitations in desired activities. Among twins who completed both assessments, there were no statistically significant differences in incidence rates of limitations as a function of zygosity. Sensitivity tests showed the same for change scores; and that, if cognitive impair ment or death are deemed to belong among limitations of desired activities, zygosity con tributed 10% to new limitations at follow-up. Maintaining personally desired activities over four years in the eighth decade is not subject to substantial genetic influence. However, if death and cognitive impairment are added to incident limitations, then genetics plays a modest role. In all cases, unique environment is the predominant influence.
1. Baltes P, Smith J. New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003;49:123-35.
2. Phelan EA, Anderson LA, LaCroix AZ, Larson EB. Older adults’ views of Successful Aging. How o they compare with researchers’ definitions? J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:211-6.
3. Katz S, Branch LG, Branson MH, et al. Active life expectancy. N Engl J Med 1983;20:1218-24.
4. Kirkwood TBL, Cordell HJ, Finch CE. Speed-bumps ahead for the genetics of later-life diseases. Trends Genet 2011;27:387-8.
5. Kirkwood TBL. Understanding ageing from an evolutionary perspective. J Intern Med 2008;263:117-27.
6. Austad SN. Is aging programmed? Aging Cell 2004;3:249-51.
7. McArdle JJ, Plassman BL. A biometric latent curve analysis of memory decline in older men of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry. Behav Genet 2009;39:472-95.
8. McGue M, Christensen K. The heritability of level and rate-of-change in cognitive functioning in Danish twins aged 70 years and older. Exp Aging Res 2002:28:435-51.
9. Christensen K, McGue M, Yashin AI. Genetic and environmental influences on functional abilities among Danish twins aged 75 years and older. J Gerontol Med Sci 2000;55A:M446-52.
10. Shih-Fan L, Beck AN, Finch BK, et al. Trends in US older adult disability: exploring age, period, and cohort effects. Am J Public Health 2012;102:2157-63.
11. Jablon S, Neel JV, Gershowitz H, et al. The NAS-NRC twin panel: methods of construction of the panel, zygosity diagnosis and proposed use. Am J Hum Genet 1967;19:133-61.
12. Reed T, Plassman BL, Tanner CM, et al. Verification of self-report of zygosity determined via DNA testing in a subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 years later. Twin Res Hum Genet 2005;8:362-67.
13. Plassman BL, Steffens DC, Burke JR, et al. Duke twins study of memory in aging in the NAS-NRC Twin Registry. Twin Res 2006;9:950-7.
14. Gurland B, Kuriansky J, Sharpe L, et al. The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE) rationale, development and reliability. Int J Aging Hum Develop 1977;8:9-14.
15. Gurland B, Katz S. The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE): an approach to evaluating potential for achieving quality of life. In: Copeland JRM, Abou-Saleh T, Blazer DG, eds. Principles and practice of geriatric psychiatry. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002.
16. Golden RR, Teresi JA, Gurland BJ. Development of indicator scales for the comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE) interview schedule. J Gerontol 1984;39:138-46.
17. Teresi JA, Golden RR, Gurland BJ. Concurrent and predictive validity or indicator-scales developed for the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation interview schedule. J Gerontol 1984;39:158-65.
18. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 7th Ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-2012.
19. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH. Mx: statistical modeling. 6th Ed. Richmond: Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia; 2003.
20. Neale MC. Mx: statistical modeling. 4th Ed. Richmond: Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia; 1997.
21. McArdle JJ, Wang L. Modeling age-based turning points in longitudinal life-span growth curves of cognition. In: Cohen P, ed. Applied data analytic techniques for turning points research. NY: Routledge; 2008. pp 105-127.
22. McArdle JJ, Hamagami F. Structural equation models for evaluating dynamic concepts within longitudinal twin analyses Behav Genet 2003;33:137-59.
23. Reynolds CA, Finkel D, McArdle JJ. Quantitative genetic analysis of latent growth curve models of cognitive abilities in adulthood. Dev Psychol 2005;41:3-16.
24. Gurland BJ, Plassman BL, Page WF. A twin study of the genetic contribution to age-related functional impairment. J Gerontol Med Sci 2004;Vl:859-63.
25. Thielke S, Diehr P. Transitions among health states using 12 measures of successful aging in men and women: results from the cardiovascular health study. J Aging Res 2012;2012:243263.
26. Hjelmborg JB, Iachine I, Skytthe A, et al. Genetic influence on human lifespan and longevity. Hum Genet 2006;119:312-21.
27. Cournil A, Kirkwood TBL. If you would live long, choose your parents well. Trends Genet 2001;17:233-5.
28. Federman AD, Penrod JD, Livote E, et al. Development of and recovery from difficulty with activities of daily living: an analysis of national data. J Aging Health 2010;22:1081.