Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 2 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.4081/​hpr.2014.1196
GENERAL

A thematic study of the role  of social support in the body  image of burn survivors

Kellie Hodder1 Anna Chur-Hansen2* Andrea Parker3
Show Less
1 School of Psychology and School of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide
2 School of Psycology, University of Adelaide
3 Burns Unit, The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
Submitted: 24 February 2013 | Revised: 17 March 2013 | Accepted: 17 March 2013 | Published: 13 January 2014
© 2014 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

There is evidence that social support is important for the development and mainte nance of body image satisfaction for people who have sustained burn injuries. This quali tative study explored the specific mechanisms by which social support impacts the body image satisfaction of burn survivors, drawing on nine participants’ in depth accounts. Participants were recruited through a burns unit at a public hospital in South Australia. Interviews were conducted with nine female burn survivors aged between 24 and 65 (mean age 44.6). Participants described their percep tions about their appearance post burn and their social support experiences. Four themes were identified: acceptance, social compari son, talking about appearance concerns, and the gaze of others. Results indicate that for these participants, social support was an important factor in coming to terms with changes in appearance, specifically support that helps to minimise feelings of difference. Unhelpful aspects of social support were also identified included feeling that suffering was being dismissed and resenting the perceived expectation from supports to be positive. Social supports are important to consider in relation to body image for those working with people who have survived burn injuries. 

Keywords
social support
body image
burns
women
qualitative
References

1. Esselman P, Thombs B, Magyar-Russell G, Fauerbach J. Burn rehabilitation: state of the science. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2006; 85:383-413. 
2. Partridge J, Robinson E. Psychological and social aspects of burns. Burns 1995;21:453-7. 
3. Patterson D, Everett J, Bombardier C, et al. Psychological effects of severe burn injuries. Psychol Bull 1993;113:362-78. 
4. Sproul J, Malloy S, Abriam-Yago K. Perceived sources of support for adult burn survivors. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:975-82. 
5. Fauerbach J, Heinberg L, Lawrence J, et al. Effect of early body image dissatisfaction on subsequent psychological and physical adjustment after disfiguring injury. Psychosom Med 2000;62:576-82. 
6. Thombs B, Haines J, Bresnick M et al. Depression in burn reconstruction patients; symptom prevalence and association with body image dissatisfaction and physical function. Gen Hosp Psychiat 2007;29:14-20. 
7. Lawrence J, Fauerbach J, Heinberg L, Doctor M. Visible vs hidden scars and their relation to body esteem. J Burn Care Rehab 2004;25:25-32. 
8. Orr D, Reznikoff M, Smith G. Body image, self-esteem, and depression in burn-injured adolescents and young. J Burn Care Rehab 1989;10:454-61. 
9. Thombs, B, Notes, L, Lawrence, J et al. From survival to socialization: a longitudinal study of body image in survivors of severe burn injury. J Psychosom Res 2008;64:205-12. 
10. Baumeister R, Leary M. The need to belong: the desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 1995;117:497-529. 
11. Croezen S, Picavet HSJ, Haveman-Nies A et al. Do positive or negative experiences of social support relate to current and future health? Results from the Doetinchem Cohort Study. BMC Pub Health 2012;12:65. 
12. Park S, Choi K, Jung Y, Oh S. The risk factors of psychosocial problems for burn patients. Burns 2008;34:24-31. 
13. Anzarut A, Chen M, Shankowsky H, Tredget E. Quality-of-life and outcome predictors following massive burn injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:791-7. 
14. Muangman P, Sullivan S, Wiechman S, et al. Social support correlates with survival in patients with massive burn injury. J Burn Care Rehab 2005;26:352-6. 
15. Wallis H, Renneberg B, Ripper S, et al. Emotional distress and psychological resources in patients: Recovering from severe burn injury. J Burn Care Res 2005;27:734-41. 
16. Rumsey N, Harcourt D. Body image and disfigurement issues and interventions. Body Image 2004;1:83-97. 
17. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101. 
18. Tracy S. Qualitative quality: eight big-tent criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010;16:837-51. 
19. Sundara D. A review of issues and concerns of family members of adult burn survivors. J Burn Care Res 2011;32:349-57. 
20. Na TC. A Qualitative analysis of adult burn survivors’ narratives of re-engagement in activities and participation following severe burn injury. Doctoral Dissertation. La Trobe University, Australia; 2008. 
21. Moi A, Gjengedal E. Life after burn injury: striving for regained freedom. Qual Health Res 2008;18:1621-30. 
22. Wilkinson S, Kitzinger C. Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients’ talk. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:797-811. 
23. Corry N, Pruzinsky T, Rumsey N. Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment to burn injury: Social functioning, body image and health policy perspectives. Int Rev Psychiatry 2009;21:539-48. 
24. Klinge K, Chamberlain D, Redden M, King L Psychological adjustments made by post-burn injury patients: an integrative literature review. JAN 2009;65:2274-92.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research