Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 9 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.52965/​001c.24510
GENERAL

Applying social cognitive theory to predict physical activity and  dietary behavior among patients with type-2 diabetes 

Ann Tresa Sebastian1 Eslavath Rajkumar1* P Tejaswini2 R Lakshmi1 J Romate1
Show Less
1 Department of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka
2 Department of Psychology, Jyothinivas College
Submitted: 17 September 2020 | Accepted: 10 November 2020 | Published: 11 June 2021
© 2021 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases, arising out of changing lifestyle habits of people, are the foremost causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Most of these diseases occur in low and middle-income countries. Chronic diseases can be managed with the help of health behaviors such as proper diet, physical exercise, adherence to medication, and avoidance of health risk behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, etc. The social cognitive theory addresses the role of personal and environmental factors in an individual’s health behavior. The current study aims to understand the role of social cognitive theory on physical activity and dietary behavior amongst individuals diagnosed with type-2 diabetes.

Methods

A correlational study was conducted among 225 participants with type-2 diabetes, who are under medication. The data was collected using social cognitive questionnaire for physical activity & dietary behavior and Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data.

Results

It was found from the study results that, all the domains of social cognitive theory were significantly correlated with physical activity (p<0.001) and the SCT domains- self-regulation (p<0.001), social support (p<0.001), and outcome expectancy (p<0.05) were significantly correlated with dietary behavior. The results of multiple linear regressions indicated that the domains self- regulation and self- efficacy were the significant predictor for physical activity behavior (R2=.21, p ≤ 0.001) while the domains social support and self-regulation were the significant predictor of dietary behavior (R2=.09, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

The study results show that there is an influence of social cognitive domains on physical activity and dietary behaviour. Further, this study suggests that social cognitive theory based intervention can be used to promote healthy behaviour.

Keywords
dietary behaviour
physical activity
type-2 diabetes
social cognitive theory
References

1. Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D, Logroscino G, Manson JE, Rimm EB. Primary prevention of stroke by a healthy lifestyle. Circulation. 2008;118(9):947-954. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.781062
2. Olatona FA, Onabanjo OO, Ugbaja RN, Nnoaham KE, Adelekan DA. Dietary habits and metabolic risk factors for non-communicable diseases in a university undergraduate population. J Health Popul Nutr. 2018;37(1):21. doi:10.1186/s41043-018-0152-2
3. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: Moving toward improved dietary guidance. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2002;76(6):1261-1271. doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1261
4. World Health Organization. Non-communicable diseases. Fact sheets. World Health Organization; 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/non-communicable-diseases
5. Selvan MS, Kurpad AV. Primary prevention: Why focus on children & young adolescents? Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2004;120(6):511-518. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mano_Selvan/publication/8077552_Primary_prevention_Why_focus_on_children_young_adolescents/links/56b0b74308ae9f0ff7b7530a/Primary-prevention-Why-focus-on-children-young-adolescents.pdf
6. Naik R, Kaneda T. Non-communicable diseases in Africa: youth are key to curbing the epidemic and achieving sustainable development. Policy brief. Population bureau; 2015. https://assets.prb.org/pdf15/ncds-africa-policybrief.pdf
7. Gamage AU, Jayawardana PL. Knowledge of non-communicable diseases and practices related to healthy lifestyles among adolescents, in state schools of a selected educational division in Sri Lanka. BMC Public Health. 2017;18(1):64. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4622-z
8. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2518-2539. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.10.2518
9. Little P, Margetts B. The importance of diet and physical activity in the treatment of conditions managed in general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 1996;46(404):187-192.
10. Dishman RK. Predicting and changing exercise and physical activity: what’s practical and what’s not. Toward active living. Published online 1994:97-106.
11. Kelly MP, Barker M. Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public Health. 2016;136:109-116. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.030
12. Rejeski WJ, Fanning J. Models and theories of health behavior and clinical interventions in aging: A contemporary, integrative approach. Clinical interventions in aging. 2019;14:1007-1019. doi:10.2147/cia.s206974
13. Becker MH, ed. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Health Education Monographs. 1974;2(4):324-473. doi:10.1177/109019817400200407
14. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs. 1974;2(4):354-386. doi:10.1177/109019817400200405
15. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall; 1980.
16. Rogers RW. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, eds. Social Psychophysiology. Guilford Press; 1983:153-176.
17. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
18. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman; 1997.
19. Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2001;127(1):142-161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142
20. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. In: Norman P, Abraham C, Conner M, eds. Understanding and Changing Behavior: From Health Beliefs to Self-Regulation. Harwood Academic; 2000.
21. Shamizadeh T, Jahangiry L, Sarbakhsh P, Ponnet K. Social cognitive theory-based intervention to promote physical activity among prediabetic rural people: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):98. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3220-z
22. Jenkins L, Hall H, Raeside R. Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in Information Science Research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Published online 2018. https://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/output-1017697/applications-and-applicability-of-social-cognitive-theory-in-information-science-research-2.pdf
23. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health. 1998;13(4):623-649. doi:10.1080/08870449808407422
24. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
25. Castonguay A, Miquelon P, Boudreau F. Self-regulation resources and physical activity participation among adults with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology Open. 2018;5(1):205510291775033. doi:10.1177/2055102917750331
26. Oyibo K, Adaji I, Vassileva J. Social cognitive determinants of exercise behavior in the context of behavior modeling: A mixed-method approach. Digital health. 2018;4:2055207618811555. doi:10.1177/2055207618811555
27. Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(2):305-338. doi:10.1007/s11764-014-0413-z
28. Taylor N, Clay-Williams R, Hogden E, Braithwaite J, Groene O. High performing hospitals: A qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1-22. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0879-z
29. Thompson D, Baranowski J, Cullen K, Baranowski T. Development of a theory-based internet program promoting maintenance of diet and physical activity change to 8-year-old African American girls. Computers & Education. 2007;48(3):446-459. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.005
30. Rinderknecht K, Smith C. Social Cognitive Theory in an After-School Nutrition Intervention for Urban Native American Youth. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2004;36(6):298-304. doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60398-9
31. Hidayanty H, Bardosono S, Khusun H, Damayanti R, Kolopaking S. A social cognitive theory-based programme for eating patterns and sedentary activity among overweight adolescents in Makassar, South Sulawesi: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016;25(1):S83-S92. http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/25%20Suppl%201/S83.pdf
32. Chapman-Novakofski K, Karduck J. Improvement in knowledge, social cognitive theory variables, and movement through stages of change after a community-based diabetes education program. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005;105(10):1613-1616. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2005.07.010
33. Nematollahi M, Eslami AA. Development and validation of social cognitive theory based questionnaire for physical activity to preventing osteoporosis (PAQ-SCT). Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018;12(3). doi:10.5812/ijpbs.12662
34. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research. 1987;36(2):76-81. doi:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002
35. Williams DM, Anderson ES, Winett RA. A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research. Annals of behavioral medicine. 2005;29(1):70-79. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2901_10
36. Young MD, Plotnikoff RC, Collins CE, Callister R, Morgan PJ. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014;15(12):983-995. doi:10.1111/obr.12225
37. Lee CG, Park S, Lee SH, Kim H, Park JW. Social Cognitive Theory and Physical Activity among Korean Male High-School Students. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(4):973-980. doi:10.1177/1557988318754572
38. Ghoreishi MS, Vahedian-Shahroodi M, Jafari A, Tehranid H. Self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: Education intervention base on social cognitive theory. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. 2019;13(3):2049-2056. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2019.04.045
39. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DM. Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: The influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychology. 2006;25(4):510-520. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.510
40. Umstattd M. Self-regulation and Physical Activity: The Relationship in Older Adults. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2008;32(2). doi:10.5993/ajhb.32.2.1
41. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Courneya KS, Birkett N, Sigal RJ. Physical activity and social cognitive theory: A test in a population sample of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Applied Psychology. 2008;57:628-643.
42. Mehta P, Sharma M, Bernard A. Social Cognitive Theory as a Predictor of Dietary Behavior and Leisure Time Physical Activity Behavior in Middle-Aged Asian Indian Women Residing in United States. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2010;30(3):257-269. doi:10.2190/iq.30.3.f
43. Doerksen SE, McAuley E. Social cognitive determinants of dietary behavior change in university employees. Front Public Health. 2014;2:23. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00023
44. Beverly EA, Fitzgerald S, Sitnikov L, Ganda OP, Caballero AE, Weinger K. Do older adults aged 60–75 years benefit from diabetes behavioral interventions? Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1501-1506. doi:10.2337/dc12-2110
45. Rolling TE, Hong MY. The effect of social cognitive theory-based interventions on dietary behavior within children. Journal of Nutritional Health and Food Science. 2016;4(5):1-9. doi:10.15226/jnhfs.2016.00179
46. Torkan N, Kazemi A, Paknahad Z, Bahadoran P. Relationship of Social Cognitive Theory Concepts to Dietary Habits of Pregnant Women. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. 2018;23(2):125-130. doi:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_157_16
47. Anderson-Bill ES, Wientt R, Wojcik J. Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations, and Social Support: Social Cognitive Theory and Nutrition Behavior. Annals of behavioral medicine: a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2007;34:304-312. doi:10.1080/08836610701677659
48. Sheeshka JD, Woolcott DM, Mackinnon NJ. Social Cognitive Theory as a Framework to Explain Intentions to Practice Healthy Eating Behaviors. J Appl Social Pyschol. 1993;23(19):1547-1573. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01047.x

Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research