Gotta catch ‘em all or not enough time: Users motivations for playing Pokémon Go™ and non-users’ reasons for not installing

Urban exergames are played in the real-world environment using built-in mobile phone sensors. The influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity and sitting time has been examined previ ously, however limited research has explored motivations for using the application. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore Pokémon Go users’ motivations for using the application, ex users’ reasons for abandoning the game and non-users’ reasons for not installing. After institutional ethical approval, the ‘Physical Activity and Pokémon Go’ questionnaire was developed using QualtricsTM and distributed using social media soon after launch in the United Kingdom (baseline). At baseline a total of 461 par ticipants (n=193 male, n=265 female, n=3 transgender) who were predominantly white (n=420) and did not self-report a disability (n=443) completed the questionnaire. Users’ (n=236) were ques tioned on their motivations for using Pokémon Go and non-users’ provided reasons for not installing. At 3 months a total of 127 par ticipants (n=23 users) completed the questionnaire again and all qualitative data was thematically analyzed. The most commonly reported reason for using Pokémon Go was ‘to have fun’ which was 86% and 83% at baseline and 3 months respectively. The sec ond most frequent reason at baseline was ‘friends were using it’ (58%) and at 3 months was ‘to be outside’ (48%). The least com mon motivation for using Pokémon Go at both baseline and 3 months was ‘to meet new people’ (8% and 0% respectively). At baseline, social motives and competition were two general themes which encapsulated Pokémon Go users’ motivation for using the application. There were two general themes reported by Pokémon Go users’ as to why they did not think they would use the applica tion in the future. These were application related factors and fac tors unrelated to Pokémon Go. Non-users reported a range of rea sons for not using Pokémon Go, including lack of interest and a lack of time. Safety concerns and risk of adverse events were reported by both users and non-users. This is the first study to the matically analyze motives for using Pokémon Go in which the findings are: 1) future smartphone applications aiming to increase physical activity must ensure that objectives evolve to maintain initial interest and motivation to engage with applications; 2) game developers must consider the required phone storage and capability which could be a barrier to downloading; and 3) con cerns of using the application including the safety of users and those around them.
1. Ayers, J.W., Leas, E.C., Dredze, M., Allem, J.P., Grabowski, J.G., & Hill, L. (2016). Pokémon GO—a new distraction for drivers and pedestrians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 176(12), 1865-1866.
2. Bauman, A.E, Reis, R.R., Sallis, J.F., Wells, J.C., Loos, R.J.F & Martin, B.W. (2012). Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet, 380, 258–271.
3. Barbero, E.M., Carpenter, D.M., Maier, J., & Tseng, D.S. (2018). Healthcare Encounters for Pokémon Go: Risks and Benefits of Playing. Games for Health, 7(3), 157-163.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5. Broom, D.R., & Flint, S.W. (2018). Gotta catch ‘em all: Impact of Pokémon Go on physical activity, sitting time and perceptions of physical activity and health at baseline and three months follow up. Games for Health, 7(6), 1-9.
6. Craig, C.L., Marshall, A.L., Sjostrom, M., Bauman, A., Booth, M.L., … Oja, P. (2003). International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(8), 1381-1395.
7. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
8. Dogitev, A. (2018). Pokémon GO Revenue and Usage Statistics (2017). http://www.businessofapps.com/data/pokemon-go-statistics/ [Last accessed October 2018].
9. Higgins, J.P. (2016). Smartphone applications for patients’ health and fitness. American Journal of Medicine, 129(1), 11-19.
10. Howe, K.B., Suharlim, C., Ueda, P., Howe, D., Kawachi, I. & Rimm, E.B. (2016). Gotta catch’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study. British Medical Journal, 355, i6270.
11. Knoell M., Dutz, T., Hardy, S. & Goebel, S. (2014). Urban Exergames: How Architects and Serious Gaming Researchers Collaborate on the Design of Digital Games that Make You Move. In: Minhua M., Lakhmi, C.J. & Paul, A (Ed). Virtual, Augmented Reality and Serious Games for Healthcare. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer.
12. Knox, E.C.L., Musson, H. & Adams, E.J. (2015). Knowledge of physical activity recommendations in adults employed in England: associations with individual and workplace-related predictors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 69.
13. Marquet, O. Alberico, C., Adlakha, D. & Hipp, J.A. (2017). Examining Motivations to Play Pokémon GO and Their Influence on Perceived Outcomes and Physical Activity. JMIR Serious Games, 5(4), e21.
14. Matallaoui, A., Koivisto, J., Hamari, J. & Zarnekow, R. (2017). How Effective Is “Exergamification”? A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Gamification Features in Exergames. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3316-3325.
15. Middelweerd, A., Mollee, J.S., van der Wal, C.N., Brug, J., & Te Velde, S.J. (2014). Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 11(1), 97.
16. Niantic (2018). The Rise of AR, Summer Adventures and Updates for the Fall. https://www.nianticlabs.com/blog/summer2018 recap/ [Last accessed October 2018].
17. Ofcom. (2017). Fast facts. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/facts. [Last accessed July 2018].
18. Pokémon Go Physical Activity Questionnaire. 2018. Physical Activity & Pokémon Go. https://shusls.eu.qualtrics.com/ SE/?SID=SV_4Git5qVSH4ZA1al. [Last Accessed July 2018].
19. Qualtrics. (2018). Qualtrics. www.qualtrics.com. [Last accessed July 2018].
20. Rasche, P., Schlomann, A. & Mertens, A. (2017). Who is still playing Pokémon Go? A Web-based survey. JMIR Serious Games, 5(2), e7.
21. Reis, R.S., Salvo, D., Ogilvie, D., Lambert, E.V, Goenka, S., & Brownson, R.C. (2016). Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet, 388(10051), 1337-1348.
22. Robertson, J., Macvean, A., Fawkner, S., Baker, G. & Jepson, R.G. (2017). Savouring our mistakes: Learning from the FitQuest project. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16, 55-67.
23. Rogers, R. (2017). The motivational pull of video game feedback, rules, and social interaction: Another self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 446-450.
24. Smith, B. & McGannon, K.R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101-121.
25. World Health Organization. Physical activity. 2018. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/. [Last accessed July 2018].
26. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44399/1/9789241599979_eng.pdf. [Last accessed July 2018].