Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 2 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.4081/​hpr.2014.1582
GENERAL

Generationing, stealthing,  and gift giving: the intentional  transmission of HIV by  HIV-positive men to their  HIV-negative sex partners

Hugh Klein1*
Show Less
1 Kensington Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD, USA
Submitted: 17 April 2014 | Revised: 31 July 2014 | Accepted: 4 August 2014 | Published: 6 November 2014
© 2014 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Gift giving is the process by which an HIV positive person purposely infects an HIV-nega tive person with HIV, usually with that person’s knowledge and consent. Little has been written about this HIV transmission practice. In this paper, two specific types of gift giving – gener ationing and stealthing – are explained and introduced to the scientific literature. Generationing is a type of gift giving in which one gift giver successfully infects a previously uninfected man with HIV, and then the two men collaborate in an effort to seroconvert another man, and so forth. Stealthing is anoth er type of gift giving in which an HIV-positive man actively tries to infect an HIV-negative man with HIV, without the latter’s knowledge or consent. The present study reports on the prevalence of gift giving (4.6%) in a population of men who use the Internet specifically to identify partners for unprotected sex. The research is based on a national random sample of 332 men who have sex with men, identified from 16 websites. Data were collected via tele phone interviews conducted between January 2008 and May 2009. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these find ings for HIV prevention and intervention efforts. Most notably, to the extent that genera tioning, stealthing, and gift giving occur among MSM, they represent a very high risk of HIV transmission. More work needs to be done to understand these behaviors, the factors that underlie them, and to determine how prevalent they are in the bare-backing population of MSM.

Keywords
men who have sex with men
HIV risk practices
Internet
gift giving
HIV transmission
generationing
References

1. Moskowitz DA, Roloff ME. The existence of a bug chasing subculture. Cult Health Sex 2007;9:347-57.
2. Dawson AG Jr., Ross MW, Henry D, Freeman A. Evidence of HIV transmission risk in barebacking men-who-have-sex-with-men: cases from the Internet. J Gay Lesbian Psychother 2005;9:73-83.
3. Grov C, Parsons JT. Bug chasing and gift giving: the potential for HIV transmission among barebackers on the Internet. AIDS Educ Prev 2006;18:490-503.
4. Tewksbury R. Click here for HIV: an analysis of Internet-based bug chasers and bug givers. Deviant Behav 2006;27:379-95.
5. Gauthier DK, Forsyth CJ. Bareback sex, bug chasers, and the gift of death. Deviant Behav 1999;20:85-100.
6. Moskowitz DA, Roloff ME. The ultimate high: sexual addiction and the bug chasing phenomenon. Sex Addict Compuls 2007;14:21-40.
7. Glaser BG. Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1998.
8. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1998.
9. US Census Bureau. Profiles of general demographic characteristics 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2001.
10. U.S. Census Bureau. GCT-PH1. Population, housing units, area, and density: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
11. Schrimshaw EW, Rosario M, Meyer-Bahlberg HFL, Scharf-Matlick AA. Test-retest reliability of self-reported sexual behavior, sexual orientation, and psycho-sexual milestones among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Arch Sex Behav 2006;35:225-34.
12. Bogart LM, Walt LC, Pavlovic JD, et al. Cognitive strategies affecting recall of sexual behavior among high-risk men and women. Health Psychol 2007;26:787-93.
13. Morisky DE, Ang A, Sneed CD. Validating the effects of social desirability on self-reported condom use behavior among commercial sex workers. AIDS Educ Prev 2002;14:351-60.
14. Anglin MD, Hser Y, Chou C. Reliability and validity of retrospective behavioral self-report by narcotics addicts. Eval Rev 1993;17:91-103.
15. Jackson CT, Covell NH, Frisman LK, Essock SM. Validity of self-reported drug use among people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. J Dual Diagn 2004;1:49-63.
16. Yacoubian GS Jr., Wish ED. Exploring the validity of self-reported ecstasy use among club rave attendees. J Psychoactive Drugs 2006;38:31-4.
17. McCready KC, Halkitis PN. HIV serostatus disclosure to sexual partners among HIV-positive methamphetamine-using gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev 2008;20:15-29.
18. Rosser BRS, Horvath KJ, Hatfield LA, et al. Predictors of HIV disclosure to secondary partners and sexual risk behavior among a high-risk sample of HIV-positive MSM: results from six epicenters in the USA. AIDS Care 2008;20:925-30.
19. Pollock JA, Halkitis PN. Environmental factors in relation to unprotected sexual behaviour among gay, bisexual, and other MSM. AIDS Educ Prev 2009;21:340-55.
20. Wolf LE, Vezina R. Is there a role for criminal law in HIV prevention? San Francisco: Center for AIDS Prevention Studies; 2005.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research