Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 2 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.4081/​hpr.2014.1535
GENERAL

How older persons structure  information in the decision to  seek medical care

Peter J. Veazie1*
Show Less
1 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, NY, USA
Submitted: 28 March 2014 | Accepted: 26 April 2014 | Published: 6 November 2014
© 2014 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Typical models of the decision to seek care consider information as a single conceptual object. This paper presents an alternative that allows multiple objects. For older persons seek ing care, results support this alternative. Older decision-makers that segregate information into multiple conceptual objects assessed sep arately are characterized by socio-demograph ic (younger age, racial category, non-Hispanic, higher education, higher income, and not mar ried), health status (better general health for men and worse general health for women, fewer known illnesses), and neuropsychologi cal (less memory loss for men, trouble concen trating and trouble making decisions for men) factors. Results of this study support the con clusion that older persons are more likely to integrate information, and individuals with identifiable characteristics are more likely to do so than others. The theory tested in this study implies a potential explanation for misu tilization of care (either over or under-utiliza tion). 

Keywords
aging research
help seeking
infor mation processing
decision-making
medicare current beneficiary survey
References

1. Kaplan MF. Information integration in social judgment: interaction of judge and informational components. In: Kaplan MF, Schwartz S, eds. Human judgment and decision processes. New York: Academic Press; 1975. pp 139-171.
2. Shanteau J. An information-integration analysis of risky decision making. In: Kaplan MF, Schwartz S, eds. Human judgment and decision processes. New York: Academic Press; 1975. pp 109-37.
3. Gigerenzer G, Selten R, eds. Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
4. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, Group AR. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Stich S, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
5. Rothrock L, Kirlik A. Inferring rule-based strategies in dynamic judgment tasks: Toward a noncompensatory formulation of the Lens Model. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part 1: Systems and Humans 2003;33:58-72.
6. Elrod T, Johnson RD, White J. A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2004;95:1-19.
7. Medin DL, Lynch EB, Solomon KO. Are there kinds of concepts? Annu Rev Psychol 2000;51:121-47.
8. McGinn C. Conceptual causation: some elementary reflections. Mind 1991;4:573-86.
9. Grady CL. Functional brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition. Biol Psychol 2000;54:259-81.
10. Viskontas IV, Morrison RG, Holyoak KJ, et al. Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychol Aging 2004;19:581-91.
11. Schacter DL, Norman KA, Koutstaal W. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annu Rev Psychol 1998;49:289-318.
12. Naveh-Benjamin M. Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. J Exp Psychol 2000;26:1170-87.
13. Johnson MK, Reeder JA, Raye CL, Mitchell KJ. Second thoughts versus second looks: an age-related deficit in reflectively refreshing just-activated information. Psychol Sci 2002;13:64-7.
14. Geary DC, Saults SJ, Liu F, Hoard MK. Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. J Exp Child Psychol 2000;77:337-53.
15. Larsson M, Lövdén M, Lars-Göran N. Sex differences in recollective experience for olfactory and verbal information. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2003;112:89-103.
16. Weber EU, Hsee CK. Culture and individual judgement and decision making. Appl Psychol 2000;49:32-61.
17. Weber EU, Hsee C. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Manag Sci 1998;44:1205-17.
18. Yates JF, Lee JW, Bush JG. General knowledge overconfidence: cross-national variations, response styles, and Reality. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1997;70:87-94.
19. Choi I, Nisbett RE, Smith EE. Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning. Cognition 1997;65:15-32.
20. Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol Rev 2001;108:291-310.
21. DiMaggio P. Culture and cognition. Annu Rev Sociol 1997;23:263-87.
22. VanLehn K. Cognitive skill acquisition. Annu Rev Psychol 1996;47:513-39.
23. Eviatar Z. Culture and brain organization. Brain Cogn 2000;42:50-2.
24. Koriat A, Goldsmith M, Pansky A. Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annu Rev Psychol 2000;51:481-537.
25. Iwashyna TJ, Christakis NA. Marriage, widowhood, and health-care use. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2137-47.
26. Langa KM, Chernew ME, Habeto MU, Katz SJ. The explosion in paid home health care in the 1990’s: who received the additional services? Med Care 2001;39:147-57.
27. Mitchell J, Krout JA. Discretion and service use among older adults: the behavioral model revisited. The Gerontologist 1998;38:159-68.
28. Finch M, Kane RL, Philp I. Developing a new metric for ADLs. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:877-84.
29. Narens L. A theory of ratio magnitude estimation. J Math Psychol 1996;40:109-29.
30. Chiou JM, Müller HG. Estimated estimating equations: semiparametric inference for clustered and longitudinal data. J Royal Stat Soc B 2005;67:531-53.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research