Sober-living houses and changes in the personal networks of individuals in recovery
Social networks are an important source of support for many people in recovery from alco hol abuse. The present study investigated the role of one particular source of support for recovery in changing the personal networks of people in recovery, sober-living houses. In a ran domized, longitudinal design changes in the network size, heterogeneity, and composition of usual aftercare and sober-living home residents were examined. Beneficial changes were found, such as increases in the number of recovering alcoholics and overall network size among sober-living home residents, particularly those who stayed six months or longer. Networks also became more homogeneous with respect to non-drinking among residents. The importance of changes in networks is discussed as well as the need for network-level analyses of personal recovery networks.
1. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zweben A. Network support for drinking, alcoholics anonymous and long-term matching effects. Addiction 1998;93:1313-33.
2. Project Match Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alc 1997;58:7-29.
3. Rice C, Longabaugh R. Measuring general social support in alcoholic patients: short forms for perceived social support. Psychol Addict Behav 1996;10:104-14.
4. Gordon AJ, Zrull MC. Social networks and recovery: one year after inpatient treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 1991;8:143-52.
5. Beattie MC, Longabaugh R. Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective well-being. Addiction 1997;92:1507-21.
6. Havassy BE, Hall SM, Wasserman DA. Social support and relapse: commonalities among alcoholics, opiate users and cigarette smokers. Addict Behav 1991;16:235-46.
7. Longabaugh R, Beattie M, Noel N, et al. The effect of social investment on treatment outcome. J Stud Alcohol 1993;54:465-78.
8. Longabaugh R, Wirtz P, Beattie MC, et al. Matching treatment focus to patient social investment and support: 18-month follow-up results. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:296-307.
9. SAMSHA’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices Oxford House; 2011. Available form: http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/ViewIntervention.aspx?id=223.
10. Jason LA, Olson BD, Ferrari JR, Lo Sasso AT. Communal housing settings enhance substance abuse recovery. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1727-9.
11. Davis MI, Jason LA. Sex differences in social support and self-efficacy within a recovery community. Am J Community Psychol 2005;36:259-74.
12. Jason LA, Davis M, Ferrari JR. The need for substance abuse aftercare: a longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addict Behav 2007;32:808-13.
13. Flynn AM, Alvarez J, Jason LA, et al. African American Oxford Houses residents: sources of abstinent social networks. J Prev Interv Community 2006;31:111-20.
14. Kim KL, Davis MI, Jason LA, Ferrari JR. Structural social support: impact on adult substance use and recovery attempts. J Prev Interv Community 2006;31:85-94.
15. Ortiz E, Alvarez J, Jason LA, et al. Abstinence social support: the impact of children in Oxford House. J Groups Addict Recover 2009;4:71-81.
16. Polcin DL, Korcha RA, Bond J, Galloway G. Sober living house for alcohol and drug dependence: 18 month outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010;38:356-65.
17. Wellman B, Gulia M. The network basis of social support: a network is more than the sum of its ties. In: Wellman B, ed. Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1999. pp 83-118.
18. Uchino BN, Uno D, Holt-Lunstad J, Flinders JB. Age-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity during acute psychological stress in men and women. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1999;54:339-46.
19. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
20. McLellan AT, Cacciola J, Kushner H, et al. The fifth edition of the addiction severity index: cautions, additions and normative data. J Subst Abuse 1992;9:461-80.
21. Clifford PR, Longabaugh R. Manual for the administration of the important people and activities instrument. Adapted for use by Project MATCH for NIAAA 5 R01AA06698-05 Environmental Treatment of Alcohol Abusers. Richard Longabaugh, Principal Investigator; 1991.
22. Clifford PR, Longabaugh R, Beattie M. Social support and patient drinking: A validation study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992;16:403.
23. Blau PM. Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press; 1977.
24. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp 137-73.
25. Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol 2008;34:405-29.
26. Polcin DL, Henderson D. A clean and sober place to live: philosophy, structure, and purported therapeutic factors in sober living houses. J Psychoactive Drugs 2008;40:153-9.
27. Polcin DL, Korcha R, Bond J, Galloway G. Eighteen month outcomes for clients receiving outpatient treatment and Sober Living Houses. J Subst Use 2010;15:352-66.
28. Czarlinski JA, Aase DM, Jason LA. Eating disorders, normative eating self-efficacy and body image self-efficacy: women in recovery homes. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2012;20:190-5.
29. Majer JM, Angulo RS, Aase DM, Jason LA. Gambling behaviors among Oxford House residents: a preliminary investigation. J Soc Serv Res 2011;37:422-7.
30. Aase DM, Jason LA, Olson BD, et al. A longitudinal analysis of criminal and aggressive behaviors among a national sample of adults in mutual-help recovery homes. In: Jason LA, Ferrari JR, eds. Recovery from addiction in communal living settings: the Oxford House model [Special Issue]. J Groups Addict Recovery 2009;4:82-91.
31. Jason LA, Mileviciute I, Aase DM, et al. How type of treatment and presence of PTSD affect employment, self-regulation, and abstinence. N Am J Psychol 2011;13:175-186.
32. Majer JM, Jason LA, North CS, et al. A longitudinal analysis of psychiatric severity upon outcomes among substance abusers residing in self-help settings. Am J Community Psychol 2008;42:145-53.
33. Millar J, Aase DM, Jason LA, Ferrari JR. Veterans residing in self-governed recovery homes for substance abuse: sociodemographic and psychiatric characteristics. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2011;35:141-4.
34. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a nine year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979;109:186-204.
35. Orth-Gomer K, Rosengren A, Wilhelmsen L. Lack of social support and incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged Swedish men. Psychosom Med 1993;55:37-43.
36. Morris M. Data driven network models for the spread of infectious disease. In: Mollison D, ed. Epidemic models: their structure and relation to data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
37. Berkman LF. The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosom Med 1995;57:245-54.
38. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:442-51.