Breaking the Silence: Exploring Peritraumatic Distress and Negative Emotions in Male and Female Physical Domestic Violence Victims
Background
Domestic violence is a widespread problem affecting individuals, families, and communities worldwide. Peritraumatic distress is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems among victims, but research on men’s experiences is limited.
Objective
We analyzed data from 48 physical domestic violence victims (16 males and 32 females) to compare their levels of peritraumatic distress and negative emotions, and to examine the types of aggressors they faced.
Methods
We used descriptives to summarize sample characteristics and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory scores and used statistical tests such as Mann-Whitney U, Shapiro-Wilk, Levene’s test, contingency tables, and chi-square to investigate differences and associations between variables.
Results
Female victims of domestic violence had significantly higher scores on the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory than male victims and experienced significantly higher levels of negative emotions than male victims, including impotence/inability to react, sadness, anger/frustration, loss of control, fear, guilt, and shame. Husbands and domestic partners were the most frequent aggressors against female victims, while wives and ex-wives were the most frequent aggressors against male victims. In addition, partners were found to be the most frequent type of aggressor in the sample. Descriptive statistics, box plots, and scatter plots were used to provide a clear picture of the sample characteristics.
Conclusion
Female victims of domestic violence reported higher levels of peritraumatic distress and negative emotions compared to men victims. Partners were the most frequent type of aggressor in the sample.
1. World Health Organization. Global and Regional Estimates of Violence against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-Partner Sexual Violence. World Health Organization; 2013. Accessed February 11, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85239
2. American Psychological Association. Intimate partner violence. https://www.apa.org. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://www.apa.org/topics/physical-abuse-violence/intimate-partner
3. World Health Organization. Violence against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018: Global, Regional and National Prevalence Estimates for Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Global and Regional Prevalence Estimates for Non-Partner Sexual Violence against Women. World Health Organization; 2021. Accessed February 11, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256
4. Karakurt G, Silver KE. Emotional Abuse in Intimate Relationships: The Role of Gender and Age. Violence Vict. 2013;28(5):804-821. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00041
5. Kolbe V, Büttner A. Domestic Violence Against Men— Prevalence and Risk Factors. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. Published online August 3, 2020. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0534
6. Sharma K, Vatsa M, Kalaivani M, Bhardwaj D. Mental health effects of domestic violence against women in Delhi: A community-based study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(7):2522. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_427_19
7. Golding JM. Intimate Partner Violence as a Risk Factor for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Family Violence. 1999;14(2):99-132. doi:10.1023/a:1022079418229
8. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Published online 2020.
9. Ferrari G, Agnew-Davies R, Bailey J, et al. Domestic violence and mental health: a cross-sectional survey of women seeking help from domestic violence support services. Global Health Action. 2016;9(1):29890. doi:10.3402/gha.v9.29890
10. Bryant RA, Harvey AG. Acute Stress Disorder: A Handbook of Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. American Psychological Association; 2000. doi:10.1037/10346-000
11. Creamer M, Burgess P, Mcfarlane AC. Post-traumatic stress disorder: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Psychol Med. 2001;31(7):1237-1247. doi:10.1017/s0033291701004287
12. Aftyka A, Rozalska I, Pawlak A, Goś A, Taczała J. Peritraumatic distress in mothers of severely ill children: a cross-sectional study. ait. 2021;53(3):232-240. doi:10.5114/ait.2021.105257
13. Vance MC, Kovachy B, Dong M, Bui E. Peritraumatic distress: A review and synthesis of 15 years of research. J Clin Psychol. 2018;74(9):1457-1484. doi:10.1002/jclp.22612
14. Resick PA, Schnicke MK. Cognitive processing therapy for sexual assault victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992;60(5):748-756. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.60.5.748
15. Schrader C, Ross A. A Review of PTSD and Current Treatment Strategies. Mo Med. 2021;118(6):546-551.
16. Bandelow B, Michaelis S. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2015;17(3):327-335. doi:10.31887/dcns.2015.17.3/bbandelow
17. Albucher RC, Liberzon I. Psychopharmacological treatment in PTSD: a critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2002;36(6):355-367. doi:10.1016/s0022-3956(02)00058-4
18. Brunet A, Weiss DS, Metzler TJ, et al. The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: A Proposed Measure of PTSD Criterion A2. AJP. 2001;158(9):1480-1485. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1480
19. Carmassi C, Bui E, Bertelloni CA, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the peritraumatic distress inventory: validity, reliability and factor analysis in a sample of healthcare workers. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2021;12(1):1879552. doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.1879552
20. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Ann Math Statist. 1947;18(1):50-60. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491
21. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52(3-4):591-611. doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
22. Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. ; 1960:278-292.
23. Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 1900;50(302):157-175. doi:10.1080/14786440009463897
24. Beck JG, McNiff J, Clapp JD, Olsen SA, Avery ML, Hagewood JH. Exploring Negative Emotion in Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Shame, Guilt, and PTSD. Behavior Therapy. 2011;42(4):740-750. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.04.001
25. Platania S, Di Nuovo S, Caruso A, Digrandi F, Caponnetto P. Stress among university students: the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SBI-U 9 scale for Academic Burnout in university students. Health Psych Res. 2020;8(2). doi:10.4081/hpr.2020.9209
26. Wang W, Wu X, Lan X. Rumination mediates the relationships of fear and guilt to posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth among adolescents after the Ya’an earthquake. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 2020;11(1):1704993. doi:10.1080/20008198.2019.1704993
27. Lenzo V, Gargano MT, Mucciardi M, Lo Verso G, Quattropani MC. Clinical Efficacy and Therapeutic Alliance in a Time-Limited Group Therapy for Young Adults. ResPsy. 2014;17(1):9-20. doi:10.4081/ripppo.2014.151
28. Caponnetto P, Maglia M, Pistritto L, Ferlito S, Cannella MC. Family violence and its psychological management at the Emergency Department: A review. Health Psych Res. 2019;7(2). doi:10.4081/hpr.2019.8558