Digital technology and mental health: Chinese university students’ perspectives on the impact of social media
Background
To address the growing concerns about mental health issues among Chinese university students, our study investigates the impact of social media on their mental health. This study intends to shed light on how these students’ use of social media platforms contributes to these mental health issues, given that it has been estimated that up to 30% of university students in China suffer from mental health issues.
Methods
We investigate the extent of this issue by looking at how Chinese social media platforms like WeChat, Weibo, and QQ impact students’ mental health. To gain a comprehensive insight into students’ perspectives, this study’s sole methodology is qualitative semi-structured interviews. Our core claim asserts that social media considerably affects Chinese university students’ mental health, with both positive and negative consequences.
Results
The findings show how closely social media use and Chinese university students’ mental health are related. These networks let people connect and get support but also encourage social comparison and stigma towards mental illness. Students use a variety of coping skills, such as self-regulation techniques, digital detoxification techniques, and looking for emotional support in online networks. These results highlight the need for a complex understanding of social media’s effects on mental health. Our study also recognizes students’ capacity for adaptation and resilience as they traverse the digital world, offering theoretical and practical applications for successfully juggling online and offline lives.
Conclusion
In the end, our study contributes to a thorough and culturally sensitive understanding of how social media affects the mental health of Chinese university students.
1.Thomala LL. Penetration rate of social media in China from 2016 to 2022. 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/234991/penetration-rate-of-social-media-in-china/
2. Akduman B. From the Great Wall to the Great Firewall: A Historical Analysis of Surveillance.
Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;7(28):442-469.
3. Wang X. The Chinese Social Media Landscape. In: Transnational Media: Concepts and Cases. ; 2019:131-140.
4. Ning X, Wong JPH, Huang S, et al. Chinese university students’ perspectives on help-seeking and mental health counseling. International journal of environmental research and public health.
2022;19(14):8259. doi:10.3390/ijerph19148259
5. Aichner T, Grünfelder M, Maurer O, Jegeni D.Twenty-five years of social media: a review of social media applications and definitions from 1994 to 2019. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking. 2021;24(4):215-222. doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0134
6. Moravčíková E. Human Downgrading–The Concept of Human Degradation on Social Media.
Communication Today. 2022;13(1):28-44.
7. Hou Y, Xiong D, Jiang T, Song L, Wang Q. Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology. 2019;13(1).doi:10.5817/CP2019-1-4
8. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. 2016;25(2):113-122. doi:10.1017/
S2045796015001067
9. Siddiqui S, Singh T. Social media its impact with positive and negative aspects. International journal of computer applications technology and research.2016;5(2):71-75. doi:10.7753/IJCATR0502.1006
10. Verduyn P, Ybarra O, Résibois M, Jonides J, Kross E. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017;11(1):274-302. doi:10.1111/sipr.12033
11. Xiong Y, Liu T. WeChat as the coordinator of polymedia: Chinese women maintaining intercultural romantic relationships. Media International Australia. 2023;188(1):160-176. doi:10.1177/1329878X221103883
12. Allen KA, Ryan T, Gray DL, McInerney DM, Waters L. Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: The positives and the potential pitfalls. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist. 2014;31(1):18-31. doi:10.1017/edp.2014.2
13. Thomas L, Orme E, Kerrigan F. Student loneliness: The role of social media through life transitions. Computers & Education. 2020;146:103754. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103754
14. Sun P, Xing L, Wu J, Kou Y. Receiving feedback after posting status updates on social networking sites predicts lower loneliness: A mediated moderation model. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2023;15(1):97-114.
15. Sampogna G, Bakolis I, Evans-Lacko S, Robinson E, Thornicroft G, Henderson C. The impact of social marketing campaigns on reducing mental health stigma: Results from the 2009–2014 Time to Change programme. European Psychiatry. 2017;40:116-122.doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.008
16. Sullivan J. China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New media & society. 2014;16(1):24-37. doi:10.1177/
1461444812472966
17. Zhao N, Zhou G. Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2020;12(4):1019-1038.
18. Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(7):2381.doi:10.3390/ijerph17072381
19. Liu C, Ma J. Social media addiction and burnout: The mediating roles of envy and social media use anxiety. Current Psychology. 2020;39(6):1883-1891.doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9998-0
20. Bailey KA, Rice C, Gualtieri M, Gillett J. Is# YogaForEveryone? The idealised flexible bodymind in Instagram yoga posts. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2022;14(5):827-842. doi:10.1080/
2159676X.2021.2002394
21. McCrory A, Best P, Maddock A. ‘It’s just one big vicious circle’: young people’s experiences of highly visual social media and their mental health. Health Education Research. 2022;37(3):167-184. doi:10.1093/
her/cyac010
22. Abaido GM. Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the United Arab Emirates. International journal of adolescence and youth. 2020;25(1):407-420. doi:10.1080/
02673843.2019.1669059
23. Swenson-Lepper T, Kerby A. Cyberbullies, trolls, and stalkers: Students’ perceptions of ethical issues in social media. Journal of Media Ethics. 2019;34(2):102-113. doi:10.1080/
23736992.2019.1599721
24. Stevens F, Nurse JR, Arief B. Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2021;24(6):367-376. doi:10.1089/
cyber.2020.0253
25. Xiang GX, Zhang YH, Gan X, et al. Cyberbullying and internet gaming disorder in Chinese youth: The role of positive youth development attributes.Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10:1017123.doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017123
26. Li L, Niu Z, Mei S, Griffiths MD. A network analysis approach to the relationship between fear of missing out (FoMO), smartphone addiction, and social networking site use among a sample of Chinese university students. Computers in Human Behavior.2022;128:107086. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107086
27. Yang H, Liu B, Fang J. Stress and problematic smartphone use severity: smartphone use frequency and fear of missing out as mediators. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021;12:659288. doi:10.3389/
fpsyt.2021.659288
28. Ma JP, Wang CX, Ye Y. Development and validation of fear of missing out scale among Chinese college students. Current Psychology. Published online 2021:1-10.
29. Pavlova A, Berkers P. Mental health discourse and social media: Which mechanisms of cultural power drive discourse on Twitter. Social Science & Medicine. 2020;263:113250. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113250
30. Jackson LA, Wang JL. Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States. Computers in human behavior. 2013;29(3):910-921. doi:10.1016/
j.chb.2012.11.024
31. Tsai WHS, Men LR. Consumer engagement with brands on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the USA. Journal of Marketing Communications. 2017;23(1):2-21.
doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.942678
32. Hsieh JK, Kunz WH, Wu AY. Virtual gifting behavior on new social media: the perspectives of the community gift-giving model and face-negotiation theory. Internet Research. 2023;33(4):1597-1632.
doi:10.1108/INTR-09-2021-0691
33. Ashraf RU, Hou F, Ahmad W. Understanding continuance intention to use social media in China: The roles of personality drivers, hedonic value, and utilitarian value. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2019;35(13):1216-1228. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1519145
34. Kolb SM. Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of emerging trends in educational research and policy studies. 2012;3(1):83-86.
35. Rindfleisch A, Malter AJ, Ganesan S, Moorman C.Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of marketing research. 2008;45(3):261-279.doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261
36. Thomala LL. Number of Sina Weibo users in China from 2017 to 2021. 2019. https://
www.statista.com/statistics/941456/china-number-of-sina-weibo-users/
37. Lochmiller CR. Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report. 2021;26(6):2029-2044. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
38. Ellemers N, Haslam SA. Social identity theory.Handbook of theories of social psychology.
2012;2:379-398. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n45
39. Turner JC. Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European journal of social psychology. 1975;5(1):1-34.doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102
40. Riffe D, Lacy S, Varouhakis M. Media system dependency theory and using the Internet for in-depth, specialized information. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research. 2008;11(1):1-14.
41. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory.Handbook of theories of social psychology.2012;1(20):416-436. doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n21
42. Alloway TP, Horton J, Alloway RG, Dawson C.Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: Do they make you smarter? Computers & Education.2013;63:10-16. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.030
43. Dontre AJ. The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2021;3(3):379-390.doi:10.1002/hbe2.229
44. Mota DCB, Silva YVD, Costa TAF, Aguiar MHDC, Marques MEDM, Monaquezi RM. Mental health and internet use by university students: coping strategies in the context of COVID-19. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2021;26:2159-2170. doi:10.1590/1413-81232021266.44142020
45. El-Khoury J, Haidar R, Kanj RR, Ali LB, Majari G.Characteristics of social media ‘detoxification’in university students. Libyan Journal of Medicine.2021;16(1). doi:10.1080/19932820.2020.1846861
46. Wang W, Liu Y. Discussing mental illness in Chinese social media: the impact of influential sources on stigmatization and support among their followers. Health communication. 2016;31(3):355-363.
doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.957376
47. Noelle-Neumann E, Petersen T. The spiral of silence and the social nature of man. In: Handbook of Political Communication Research. ; 2004:357-374. 48. Grossberg L. Identity and cultural studies: is that all there is? Questions of cultural identity. 1996;1:87-107.
49. Berry JW. Theories and models of acculturation.In: The Oxford Handbook of Acculturation and Health. ; 2017:15-28.
50. Abdullah T, Brown TL. Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review.2011;31(6):934-948. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.003