DNA metabarcoding technology for the identification of the fecal microbiome in patients with chronic stress
In the latest research, the concept of stress is associated with the deregulation of several biological systems sensitive to stress, such as the immune system, the microbiome, the endocrine system and neuroanatomical substrates. The objective of the research was to identify the fecal microbiome in patients diagnosed with chronic stress and in healthy patients through a metabarcoding analysis. The methodology used fecal samples collected from 20 patients with stress and 20 healthy patients. For the diagnosis of stress, psychological tools previously validated by external researchers were used. For metabarcoding analysis, metagenomic DNA extraction was performed from the fecal samples. Next Generation Illumina genetic sequencing targeting the 16S rDNA gene was then performed, followed by bioinformatic analysis using QUIME II software. The results, at the psychological test level, 20 people with chronic stress were diagnosed, on the other hand, at the metabarcoding level, specifically at the Gender level, the Asteroleplasma bacteria present only in the 20 healthy patients was molecularly identified. On the other hand, the bacteria Alistipes and Bifidobacterium were identified with greater predominance in the 20 patients with stress. Concluding, the bacteria Alistipes and Bifidobacterium are candidates as possible markers of the intestinal microbiome in patients with chronic stress, and the bacteria Asteroleplasma are candidates as a bacterial marker of the intestinal microbiome in healthy people. Finally, the identification of the microbiome in patients with stress opens a new path to understanding stress and its relationship to dysregulation with the microbiome.
1. Yıldırım M, Arslan G. Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(8):5712-5722. doi:10.1007/s12144-02001177-2
2. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
3. Dominguez-Bello MG, Godoy-Vitorino F, Knight R, Blaser MJ. Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut. 2019;68(6):1108-1114. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317503
4. Moyano LM, Gamboa R, Vilchez P, Noriega S, Carbajal J. Situaciòn Epidemiologica en pandemia COVID 19 Tumbes, Perú. Published online 2020. https://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/tools/teleconferencia/2020/SE332020/01.pdf
5. Serrano ALR, Azahuanche MÁP. Estrés en los docentes en tiempos de pandemia Covid-19. Polo del Conocimiento: Revista científico-profesional. 2020;5(12):637-653. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8042542
6. Kraimi N, Lormant F, Calandreau L, et al. Microbiota and stress: a loop that impacts memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;136:105594. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105594
7. Burokas A, Arboleya S, Moloney RD, et al. Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Prebiotics Have Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects and Reverse the Impact of Chronic Stress in Mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82(7):472-487. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.031
8. Li N, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation from chronic unpredictable mild stress mice donors affects anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in recipient mice via the gut microbiota-inflammation-brain axis. Stress. 2019;22(5):592-602. doi:10.1080/10253890.2019.1617267
9. MacKay M, Yang BH, Dursun SM, Baker GB. The Gut-Brain Axis and the Microbiome in Anxiety Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(5):866-883. doi:10.2174/1570159X21666230222092029
10. Gyles TM, Nestler EJ, Parise EM. Advancing preclinical chronic stress models to promote therapeutic discovery for human stress disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024;49(1):215-226. doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01625-0
11. Hernández-Sampieri R, Fernández-Collado C, Baptista-Lucio P. Selección de la muestra. Metodología de la Investigación. 2014;6(1):170-191. https://www.esup.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2.%20Hernandez,%20Fernandez%20y%20Baptista-Metodolog%C3%ADa%20Investigacion%20Cientifica%206ta%20ed.pdf
12. Campbell DT. Boring and Applied Psychology. American Psychologist. 1980;35(5):472. doi:10.1037/h0078338
13. Galkiewicz JP, Kellogg CA. Cross-kingdom amplification using bacteria-specific primers: complications for studies of coral microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(24):7828-7831. doi:10.1128/AEM.01303-08
14. Enichen E, Harvey C, Demmig-Adams B. COVID-19 Spotlights Connections between Disease and Multiple Lifestyle Factors. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022;17(2):231-257. doi:10.1177/15598276221123005
15. LeMoult J, Battaglini AM, Grocott B, Jopling E, Rnic K, Yang L. Advances in stress and depression research. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2023;36(1):8-13. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000831
16. Koenen KC, Ratanatharathorn A, Ng L, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med. 2017;47(13):2260-2274. doi:10.1017/S0033291717000708
17. Ke S, Hartmann J, Ressler KJ, Liu YY, Koenen KC. The emerging role of the gut microbiome in posttraumatic stress disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;114:360-370. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.09.005
18. Galley JD, Mashburn-Warren L, Blalock LC, et al. Maternal anxiety, depression and stress affects offspring gut microbiome diversity and bifidobacterial abundances. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;107:253-264. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2022.10.005
19. Hemmings SMJ, Malan-Müller S, van den Heuvel LL, et al. The Microbiome in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Trauma-Exposed Controls: An Exploratory Study. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(8):936-946. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000512
20. Wei W, Liu Y, Hou Y, et al. Psychological stress-induced microbial metabolite indole-3-acetate disrupts intestinal cell lineage commitment. Cell Metab. 2024;36(3):466-483.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.12.026
21. Mir HD, Milman A, Monnoye M, et al. The gut microbiota metabolite indole increases emotional responses and adrenal medulla activity in chronically stressed male mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;119:104750. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104750
22. Jaglin M, Rhimi M, Philippe C, et al. Indole, a Signaling Molecule Produced by the Gut Microbiota, Negatively Impacts Emotional Behaviors in Rats. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:216. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00216
23. Sah RK, Nandan A, Kv A, et al. Decoding the role of the gut microbiome in gut-brain axis, stress-resilience, or stress-susceptibility: A review. Asian J Psychiatry. 2024;91:103861. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103861
24. Nhu NT, Chen DY, Yang YSH, Lo YC, Kang JH. Associations Between Brain-Gut Axis and Psychological Distress in Fibromyalgia: A Microbiota and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Pain. 2024;25(4):934-945. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.015
25. Mulder RH, Kraaij R, Schuurmans IK, et al. Early-life stress and the gut microbiome: A comprehensive population-based investigation. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;118:117-127. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.02.024
26. Long ES, Penalver Bernabe B, Xia K, et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and perceived stress in the perinatal period. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2023;26(2):227-234. doi:10.1007/s00737-023-01300-9
27. González-Jaimes NL, Tejeda-Alcántara AA, Espinosa-Méndez CM, Ontiveros-Hernández ZO. Impacto psicológico en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos por confinamiento durante la pandemia por Covid-19. Published online 2020. doi:10.1590/scielopreprints.756
28. Garrosa E, Moreno-Jiménez B, Liang Y, González JL. The relationship between sociodemographic variables, job stressors, burnout, and hardy personality in nurses: an exploratory study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(3):418-427. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.003
29. Herrera CJ, Owens GP, Mallinckrodt B. Traditional machismo and caballerismo as correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction in Hispanic veterans. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 2013;41(1):21-35. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2013.00024.x
30. Martínez NMM, Olivencia JJL. Experiencias formativas de uso didáctico de la realidad aumentada con alumnado del grado de educación primaria en la universidad de Málaga. Edmetic. 2017;6(1):81-104. doi:10.21071/edmetic.v6i1.5809