The Doctor-Patient relationship: A bibliometric analysis
Objective
Doctor-patient communication is an essential clinical practice necessary to improve overall patient experience and their adherence to treatment. This form of communication involves first, listening without interruptions and then, conveying information in a clear and concise manner.
Methods
A bibliometric analysis was conducted on publications extracted from the Web of Science database related to doctor-patient communication from 2012 to 2022 using the VOSviewer 1.6.15 software to visualize trends.
Results
20,376 articles were from 2012 to 2022 met the inclusion criteria of being recognized by the search phrase “physician-patient communication.” Throughout the defined time period, USA, Canada, and Germany consistently took the top three positions in terms of publishing the most articles regarding the topic. Additionally, the Patient Education and Counseling Journal was the journal with the most publications regarding the topic.
Innovation
A bibliometric analysis is a relatively novel way to frame research in a given area. It allows researchers to analyze trends in publication, and capture data from multiple disciplines.
Conclusion
The number of articles published annually regarding doctor-patient communication has constantly been increasing from 2012-2022, demonstrating its importance as a crucial component of effective health care.
1. Wang Y, Wu Q, Wang Y, Wang P. The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician-Patient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives. J Clin Psychol Med Settings.2022;29(4):849-860.doi:10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1
2. Benedetti F. Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor-patient relationship. Physiological Reviews.2013;93(3):1207-1246. doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2012
3. Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, et al. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med.2004;79(6):495-507.doi:10.1097/00001888-200406000-00002
4. Street RL Jr, Gordon H, Haidet P. Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor? Soc Sci Med.2007;65(3):586-598. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036
5. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med.2006;21(Suppl 1):S16-S20.doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x
6. Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen S, et al. Bibliometric analysis of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry.2021;65:102846.doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102846
7. Li B, Lu Y, Li J, Jiang H, Wang Y. Exploring the spatial-temporal variations and policy-based driving force behind groundwater contamination and remediation research in past decades. Environ Sci Pollut Res.2021;28(11):13188-13201.doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11382-y
8. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics.2010;84(2):523-538.doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
9. Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics.2016;10(4):1178-1195.doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
10. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med.2003;57(5):791-806. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5
11. Haustein S, Costas R, Lariviere V. Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PloS one.2015;10(3):e0120495. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
12. Effective patient-physician communication. Committee Opinion No.587. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol.2014;123(2):389-393. doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000443279.14017.12