Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 10 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.52965/​001c.57551
Cite this article
1
Download
8
Citations
23
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
GENERAL

Impact of Toxic Leadership on Employee Performance  

Christian Wiradendi Wolor1 Ardiansyah Ardiansyah2 Rofi Rofaida3 Ahmad Nurkhin4 Mahmoud Ali Rababah5
Show Less
1 Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
2 Politeknik Tempo, Politeknik Tempo
3 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
4 Universitas Negeri Semarang, Universitas Negeri Semarang
5 Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Balqa Applied University
Published: 16 December 2022
© 2022 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

This research intends to shed additional light on the effects of toxic leadership on employee satisfaction, motivation, and performance. Such a study on toxic leadership is required since, to date, no research in Indonesia have sought to quantify the consequences of toxic leadership on organizational leaders. Using surveys and structural equation modeling, a quantitative strategy was adopted (SEM). The research sample amounted to 400 taken from 8 locations in Indonesia. Using Google Forms, questionnaires were distributed to 400 employees and analyzed using the Lisrel 8.5 program. The results show that toxic leadership has an effect on job satisfaction (p > 0.00), toxic leadership has an effect on work motivation (p > 0.00), toxic leadership has no effect on employee performance (p < 0.00), job satisfaction has an effect on work motivation (p > 0.00), job satisfaction has effect on employee performance (p > 0.00) work motivation has no effect on employee performance (p < 0.00). The consequences of the study findings for organizations range from the process of screening and selection of leaders to creating stress management and self-resilience training to help employees deal with their emotions in healthy ways and strengthen their defenses.

Keywords
Toxic Leadership
Job Satisfaction
Work Commitment
Employee Performance
JEL C92 L83 O15
References

1. Akca M. The Impact of Toxic Leadership on Intention to Leave of Employees. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research. 2017;1(04):285-298. 
2. Paltu A, Brouwers M. Toxic Leadership: Effects on Job Satisfaction, Commitment, Turnover Intention and Organisational Culture within the South African Manufacturing Industry. SA j hum resour manag. 2020;18:1-11. doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1338 
3. Mergen A, Ozbilgin MF. Understanding the Followers of Toxic Leaders: Toxic Illusio and Personal Uncertainty. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2021;23(1):45-63. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12240 
4. Maheshwari G, Mehta S. Toxic Leadership: Tracing The Destructive Trail. International Journal of Management. 5(10):18-24. 
5. Vreja LO, Balan S, Bosca LC. An Evolutionary Perspective on Toxic Leadership. Management and Economics Review. 2016;1(2):217-228. 
6. Labrague LJ, Lorica J, Nwafor CE, Cummings GG. Predictors of toxic leadership behaviour among nurse managers: A cross‐sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(2):165-176. doi:10.1111/jonm.13130 
7. Gallus JA, Walsh BM, van Driel M, Gouge MC, Antolic E. Intolerable Cruelty: A Multilevel Examination of the Impact of Toxic Leadership on U.S. Military Units and Service Members. Military Psychology. 2013;25(6):588-601. doi:10.1037/mil000022 
8. Bhandarker A, Rai S. Toxic Leadership: Emotional Distress and Coping Strategy. IJOTB. 2019;22(1):65-78. doi:10.1108/ijotb-03-2018-0027 
9. Saqib A, Arif M. Employee Silence as Mediator in the Relationship between Toxic Leadership Behavior and Organizational Learning. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences. 2017;10(2):294-310. 
10. Kurtulmuş BE. Toxic Leadership and Workplace Bullying: The Role of Followers and Possible Coping Strategies. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being; 2020:1-20. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02470-3_24-1 
11. Yavaş A. Sectoral Differences in the Perception of Toxic Leadership. In: 5th International Conference on Leadership, Technology, Innovation and Business Management. Vol 229. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 2016:267-276. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.137 
12. Fahie D. The Lived Experience of Toxic Leadership in Irish Higher Education. IJWHM. 2019;13(3):341-355. doi:10.1108/ijwhm-07-2019-0096 
13. Armitage A. The Dark Side: The Poetics of Toxic Leadership. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2015;17(3):376-390. doi:10.1177/1523422315587905 
14. Hadadian Z, Zarei J. Relationship between Toxic Leadership and Job Stress of Knowledge Workers. Studies in Business and Economics. 2016;11(3):84-89. doi:10.1515/sbe-2016-0037 
15. Mehta S, Maheshwari GC. Consequence of Toxic Leadership on Employee Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. NS. 2013;8(2):1-23. https://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=bth&AN=94508005&site=ehost-live&scope=site 
16. Hakim L. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil Melalui Motivasi Pada Dinas Perhubungan Kota Palembang. ILMIAH. 2011;III(3). 
17. Murty WA, Hudiwinarsih G. Pengaruh Kompensasi, Motivasi Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Akuntansi (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Surabaya). TIAR. 2012;2(02):215. doi:10.14414/tiar.v2i02.97 
18. John AG, Francis AI, Chukwu II. Improving Sales Performance through Sales Force Motivation Strategies: A Study of Pharmaceutical Firms in Nigeria. IntJBussMgtEcoRes. 3(5):1-15. 
19. Siagian SP. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara 
20. Indradevi R. Toxic Leadership over the Years – A Review R. Purushartha. 2016;9(1). 
21. Toropova A, Myrberg E, Johansson S. Teacher Job Satisfaction: The Importance of School Working Conditions and Teacher Characteristics. Educational Review. 2020;73(1):1-27. doi:10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247 
22. Kong H, Jiang X, Chan W, Zhou X. Job Satisfaction Research in the Field of Hospitality and Tourism. IJCHM. 2018;30(5):2178-2194. doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2016-0525 
23. Dhamija P, Gupta S, Bag S. Measuring of Job Satisfaction: The Use of Quality of Work Life Factors. BIJ. 2019;26(3):871-892. doi:10.1108/bij-06-2018-0155 
24. Hoboubi N, Choobineh A, Kamari Ghanavati F, Keshavarzi S, Akbar Hosseini A. The Impact of Job Stress and Job Satisfaction on Workforce Productivity in an Iranian Petrochemical Industry. Safety and Health at Work. 2017;8(1):67-71. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2016.07.002 
25. Chandani A, Mehta M, Mall A, Khokhar V. Employee Engagement: A Review Paper on Factors Affecting Employee Engagement. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016;9(15). doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92145 
26. Bakkal E, Serener B, Myrvang NA. oxic Leadership and Turnover Intention: Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2019;66:88-102. doi:10.33788/rcis.66.6 
27. Rizal M, Idrus MS, Mintarti R. Effect of Compensation on Motivation, Organizational Commitment and Employee Performance (Studies at Local Revenue Management in Kendari City). International Journal of Business and Management Invention. 3(2):2319-8028. 
28. Abdullah Darwanis Z, Zain B. Auditor Melalui Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Studi Pada Auditor Intern. Jurnal Akuntansi. 2012;2(1):142-150. 
29. Khuong MN, Thai Hoang Quoc are with the School of Business, International University, VNU-HCM, Vietnam, Hoang Quoc T. The Effects of Organizational Justice and Ethical Leadership on Employee Performance in Binh Duong’s Industrial Parks, Vietnam. JOEBM. 2016;4(4):327-333. doi:10.178/joebm.2016.4.4.412 
30. Sekaran U, Bougie R. John Wiley & Sons Research Methods for Business. 7th ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 
31. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Pearson New International Edition 
32. Yamin S, Kurniawan H. Structural Equation Modeling: Belajar Lebih Mudah Teknik Analisis Data Kuesioner Dengan Lisrel – PLS. Penerbit Salemba Infotek; 2009. 
33. Abaasi MI. Psychometric Evaluation of Job Satisfaction Scale in Uganda’s Teacher Population Sample. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: GLinguistics & Education. 2016;16(6):43-50. 
34. Hee OC et al. Exploring the Impact of Communication on Employee Performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2019;8(3S2):654-658. 
35. Wijanto SH. Structural Equation Modeling Dengan Lisrel 8.8. Graha Ilmu; 2008.
36. Matos K, O’Neill OM, Lei X. Toxic Leadership and the Masculinity Contest Culture: How “Win or Die” 
Cultures Breed Abusive Leadership. Journal of Social Issues. 2018;74(3):500-528. doi:10.1111/josi.12284 
37. Snow N, Hickey N, Blom N, O’Mahony L, MannixMcNamara P. An Exploration of Leadership in Post
Primary Schools: The Emergence of Toxic Leadership. Societies. 2021;11(2):54. doi:10.3390/soc11020054 
38. Dobbs JM, Do JJ. The Impact of Perceived Toxic Leadership on Cynicism in Officer Candidates. Armed 
Forces & Society. 2019;45(1):3-26. doi:10.1177/0095327x17747204 
39. Milosevic I, Maric S, Lončar D. Defeating the Toxic Boss: The Nature of Toxic Leadership and the 
Role of Followers. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 27(2):1-21. 
40. Al Mehrzi N, Singh SK. Competing through Employee Engagement: A Proposed Framework. 
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2016;65(6):831-843. 
doi:10.1108/ijpp m-02-2016-0037 

Conflict of interest
Toxic Leadership, Job Satisfaction, Work Commitment, Employee Performance, JEL C92 L83 O15
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research