Chaperones Utilization in Clinical Practice: Intimate and Sensitive Physical Examination Best Practice Strategies and Concepts in Modern Urological Medicine
The intention of utilizing chaperones during sensitive physical exams is to show respect to the patient, while simultaneously providing protection to both the patient and the medical provider. Despite clinical practice recommendations to offer chaperones for sensitive urologic exams, there is no data regarding the consistency of chaperone utilization. Our aim was to summarize the patient and provider perspectives on the role of chaperones in urology as well as identify barriers to implement chaperone consistency. In the present investigation, we conducted a systematic review of prospective, case-control, and retrospective studies and followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for data reporting. Studies were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, and PMC using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “chaperones, patient”, “chaperones, medical”, and keywords “chaperones”, and “urology”. Studies were included if they addressed patient/provider perspectives on chaperone utilization in urology specifically and were excluded if they investigated perspectives on chaperone utilization in other specialties. Preliminary study identification yielded 702 studies, 9 of which were eligible for this review after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 4 studies focused on the patient perspective and 5 focused on the provider perspective. The percentage of patients that did not have a chaperone present during their urologic exam ranged from 52.9-88.5%. A greater proportion of these patients were male. Patients (59%) prefer a family member compared to a staff member as a chaperone. Physicians (60%) prefer staff member chaperones compared to family members. One study reported that 25.6% of patients did not feel comfortable to ask for a chaperone if they were not offered one. Two studies reported the percentage of patients who believed chaperones should be offered to all urology patients, ranging from 73-88.4%. Three studies reported the use of chaperones in the clinic which ranged from 5-72.5%. Two studies reported chaperone utilization documentation, ranging between 16-21.3%. Two studies reported the likelihood of chaperone utilization depending on gender of the physician, showing that male physicians were more likely to utilize chaperones and were 3x more likely to offer chaperones to their patients compared to female physicians. Research suggests that there are differing perspectives between patients and physicians regarding the specific role and benefits chaperones offer during a sensitive urologic examination, as well as differences in preferences of who should perform the role of the chaperone. While more work needs to be done to bridge the divide between clinical practice and patient/physician preferences, the act of offering chaperones to urologic patients, regardless if they want to utilize a chaperone for their examination is respectful of patient privacy and decision making.
1. Scull D, Chung P, Dugi D, Dy G. Creating a gender-affirming environment for Urologic Care - American Urological Association. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.auanet.org//membership/publications-overview/aua-news/all-articles/2021/april-2021/creating-a-gender-affirming-environment-for-urologic-care
2. Washington SL III, Baradaran N, Gaither TW, et al. Racial distribution of urology workforce in United States in comparison to the general population. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(4):526-534. doi:10.21037/tau.2018.05.16
3. Rymer J, Durbaba S, Rosenthal J, Jones RH. Use of chaperones by obstetricians and gynaecologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):8-11. doi:10.1080/01443610601016768
4. Alam M, Mirza M, Thompson J, Kowalik C. MP23-07 patient preference regarding chaperone use in the outpatient Urology Clinic. Journal of Urology. 2021;206(Supplement 3). doi:10.1097/ju.000000000002014.07
5. Sinha S, De A, Jones N, Jones M, Williams RJ, Vaughan-Williams E. Patients’ attitude towards the use of a chaperone in breast examination. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91(1):46-49. doi:10.1308/003588409x358971
6. Whitford DL, Karim M, Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(466):381-383.
7. Sinclair AM, Gunendran T, Pearce I. Use of chaperones in the urology outpatient setting: a patient’s choice in a “patient-centred” service. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(975):64-65. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.047134
8. Han J, Noennig B, Pavlinec J, et al. Patient perceptions of chaperones during intimate examinations and procedures in Urology Clinic. Urology Practice. 2019;6(1):13-17. doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2018.04.001
9. Ong E, Garnett S, MacFarlane JR, Donat R. Do we need chaperones for intimate examination in urology clinics? patients’ preferences and Urologists’ practice in Scotland. British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology. 2010;3(2):46-51. doi:10.1016/j.bjmsu.2009.11.004
10. Demzik A, Filippou P, Smith A. Differences in Urology Residency Applications by Gender: What Are They? How Do We Fix Them? Differences in urology residency applications by gender: What are they? how do we fix them? American Urological Association. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.auanet.org/membership/publications-overview/aua-news/all-articles/2022/april-2022/differences-in-urology-residency-applications-by-gender-what-are-they-how-do-we-fix-them
11. Chaperone policy - Beebe Healthcare. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.beebehealthcare.org/sites/default/files/chaperone-policy.pdf
12. Yook HS, Jang KY, Lee H. Chaperone: for or against doctors. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(4):599-600. doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.599
13. Intimate examinations and chaperones - ethical guidance summary. GMC. Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/intimate-examinations-and-chaperones
14. Sharma N, Kathleen Mary Walsh A, Rajagopalan S. An audit on the use of chaperones during intimate patient examinations. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;7:58-60. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2016.03.005
15. Javaid A. Feminism, masculinity and male rape: Bringing male rape ‘out of the closet.’ Journal of Gender Studies. 2014;25(3):283-293. doi:10.1080/09589236.2014.959479
16. Jones K, Biezen R, Beovich B, van Hecke O. Chaperones for intimate examinations in family medicine: findings from a pilot study in Melbourne, Australia. Med Sci Law. 2015;55(1):6-10. doi:10.1177/0025802413518318
17. Watson RA. Examining Genitalia—Chaperone or Go it Alone? Urology. 2019;128:14-15. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.029
18. Modgil V, Barratt R, Summerton DJ, Muneer A. Chaperone use amongst UK urological surgeons – an evaluation of current practice and opinion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98(4):268-269. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2016.0071
19. An official position statement of the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. The Use of Chaperones during Sensitive Examinations and Treatments. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2022;51(2):e1-e2. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2021.12.002
20. Guidozzi Y, Gardner J, Dhai A. Professionalism in the intimate examination: how healthcare practitioners feel about having chaperones present during an intimate consultation and examination. S Afr Med J. 2012;103(1):25-27. doi:10.7196/samj.6224