The A to E (ABCDE) Pit Crew Model: A Novel Approach to Team Based Care of Critical Patients in the Prehospital Setting
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Pit Crew intervention to improve team dynamics and time to performance of critical actions in a prehospital critical care scenario. The primary outcome was successful completion of critical actions and time to completion of these critical actions. Secondary outcomes included effectiveness of communication and overall team functioning.
Methods
The study was conducted with a fire-based Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system with 233 paramedics and 115 Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT). Eight EMS crews comprised of five members each were randomly selected and assigned to either the intervention or the control group. The intervention group (n=20) watched a thirty-minute video prior to the training describing the “Pit Crew Approach;” the control group (n=20) did not watch the video. Each crew was given the same simulation scenario of a pediatric patient that had overdosed on a beta-blocker. Completion of predetermined critical tasks were noted and timestamped. A survey was administered to the participants following the training to assess team dynamics and level of confidence.
Results
Three outcomes were statistically significant between the two arms: The interventional group felt they themselves had a more defined role in the resuscitation in comparison to the non-interventional group (p= 0.021). The interventional group also felt that their team members had a clearer and more defined role than the nonintervention group (p= 0.018). The interventional group also felt more confident managing a beta blocker overdose than the nonintervention group (p.007). The only statistically significant secondary outcome finding was in scene departure decision: the interventional arm spent more time on-scene (p=0.031). Of note, the non-intervention group missed performing tasks more often than the interventional group and team leaders of these groups often performed task(s) while also directing the patient care.
Conclusion
The Pit Crew model was developed to optimize communication and team function. Our data identified that a formal instruction of the pit crew approach to a critical care scenario improved comfort in patient care. Future studies are needed evaluate other methods of training and the effects of continued formal pit-crew training over time.
1. Hopkins CL, Burk C, Moser S, Meersman J, Baldwin C, Youngquist ST. Implementation of Pit Crew Approach and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Metrics for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Improves Patient Survival and Neurological Outcome. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016;5(1):e002892. doi:10.1161/jaha.115.002892
2. Braithwaite S, Friesen JE, Hadley S, et al. A tale of three successful EMS systems. How coordinated "pit crew" procedures have helped improve cardiac arrest resuscitations in the field. JEMS: a journal of emergency medical services. Published online 2014:28-35.
3. Vindhyal MR, Vindhyal S, Nduna P, Duran B. Abstract WP477: Neuro-Cognitive Outcomes After Transitioning to Pit Crew Model for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Stroke. 2020;51(Suppl_1). doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.wp477
4. Glendenning D. Putting the pit crew approach into practice. EMS world. 2012;41(11):41.
5. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(1):63-81. doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.889576
6. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 1988;12(2):257-285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
7. Cognitive Load and the Emergency Physician-emDOCs.net-Emergency Medicine Education Cognitive Load and the Emergency Physician. emDOCs.net-Emergency Medicine Education. Published 2016. Accessed March 3, 2021. http://www.emdocs.net/cognitive load/
8. Spitzer CR, Evans K, Buehler J, Ali NA, Besecker BY. Code blue pit crew model: A novel approach to in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2019;143:158-164. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.290
9. Colquitt JD, Walker AB, Haney NS. Applying the Pit Crew Resuscitation Model to the Inpatient Care Setting. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2019;35(1):E1-E7. doi:10.1097/nnd.0000000000000495
10. Van Dillen CM, Tice MR, Patel AD, et al. Trauma simulation training increases confidence levels in prehospital personnel performing life-saving interventions in trauma patients. Emergency Medicine International. 2016;2016:1-5. doi:10.1155/2016/5437490
11. Shah MN, Rajasekaran K, Sheahan WDI, Wimbush T, Karuza J. The effect of the geriatrics education for emergency medical services training program in a rural community. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(6):1134-1139. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01738.x
12. Reilly MJ, Markenson D, DiMaggio C. The comfort level of emergency medical service providers in responding to weapons of mass Destruction Events: Impact of training and equipment. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2007;22(4):297-303. doi:10.1017/s1049023x00004908
13. Hopkins CL, Burk C, Moser S, Meersman J, Baldwin C, Youngquist ST. Implementation of pit crew approach and cardiopulmonary resuscitation metrics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improves patient survival and neurological outcome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(1). doi:10.1161/jaha.115.002892