AccScience Publishing / HPR / Volume 2 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2014.1464
Cite this article
1315
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
GENERAL

Banding together:  an investigation  of post-surgery support groups  for laparoscopic adjustable  gastric banding patients

Melissa Opolski1,2 Helen Winefield1,2* Cate Howell3 Jim Toouli3 Jane Collins3 Lilian Kow3
Show Less
1 School of Psychology , University of Adelaide
2 Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine , University of Adelaide
3 Adelaide Bariatric Centre, Flinders Private Hospital, Bedford Park , Australia
Received: 29 March 2013 | Revised: 23 April 2013 | Accepted: 24 April 2013 | Published online: 26 April 2014
© 2014 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Though advocated as useful for patients, there is little in the literature regarding the use and effectiveness of bariatric support groups. This study investigated characteristics and experiences of bariatric patients who did and did not attend offered groups. Seventy eight postoperative laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding patients from a private bariatric clinic completed mailed self-report questionnaires. Almost 60% reported having attended the clinic groups, with most wanting to meet other patients and obtain information rather than access psychological assistance. Participants reported generally positive experi ences of attending. Nonattendance was often attributed to practical barriers. Satisfaction with support from others was not related to past or predicted future attendance, but higher psychological distress was related to and pre dictive of greater intention to attend future groups. Likely future attenders also held more positive beliefs about the groups than those who were unlikely to attend. Further research is required into potential positive and negative consequences of attendance, and characteris tics of those who are likely to benefit or be harmed by attending. Interventions addressing stereotypes about support groups may help patients make informed decisions about whether to attend a bariatric support group.

Keywords
bariatric surgery
distress
support groups
attendance
beliefs
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
References

1. McMahon MM, Sarr MG, Clark MM, et al. Clinical management after bariatric surgery: value of a multidisciplinary approach. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:S34-45.
2. Colles SL, Dixon JB. Night eating syndrome: impact on bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2006;16:811-20.
3. Elkins G, Whitfield P, Marcus J, et al. Noncompliance with behavioural recommendations following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2005;15:546-51.
4. Saunders R. Grazing: a high-risk behaviour. Obes Surg 2004;14:98-102.
5. Kinzl JF, Trefalt E, Fiala M. Psychotherapeutic treatment of morbidly obese patients after gastric banding. Obes Surg 2002;12:292-4.
6. Saunders R. Post-surgery group therapy for gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg 2004;14:1128-31.
7. Ogden J, Avenell S, Ellis G. Negotiating control: patients’ experiences of unsuccessful weight-loss surgery. Psychol Health 2011;26:949-64.
8. Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED. Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology 2007;16:379-400.
9. Schopler JH, Galinsky MJ. Support groups as open systems: a model for practice and research. Health Soc Work 1993;18:195-207.
10. Marcus JD, Elkins GR. Development of a model for a structured support group for patients following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2004;14:103-6.
11. Orth WS, Madan AK, Taddeucci RJ, et al. Support group meeting attendance is associated with better weight loss. Obes Surg 2008;18:391-4.
12. Elakkary E, Elhorr A, Aziz F, et al. Do support groups play a role in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding? Obes Surg 2006;16:331-4.
13. Hildebrandt SE. Effects of participation in bariatric support group after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 1998;8:535-42.
14. Ussher J, Kirsten L, Butow P, Sandoval M. What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:2565-76.
15. Kessler RC, Mroczek DK. Final version of our non-specific psychological distress scale. Thesis dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan; 1994.
16. Winefield HR, Coventry BJ, Lewis M, Harvey EJ. Attitudes of patients with breast cancer toward support groups. J Psychosoc Oncol 2003;21:39-54.
17. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
18. Sandelowski M. Qualitative analysis: what is it and how to begin? Res Nurs Health 1995;18:371-5.
19. Grande GE, Myers LB, Sutton SR. How do patients who participate in cancer support groups differ from those who do not? Psychooncology 2006;15:321-34.
20. Ussher J, Kirsten L, Butow P, Sandoval M. A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group. Soc Work Health Care 2008;47:14-29.
21. Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J. Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: who benefits from what? Health Psychol 2000;19:107-14.

Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by AccScience Publishing